Prev: [PATCH] USB: cp210x: Add four new device IDs
Next: Getting error message "Cannot read inode bitmap". Someone able to help?
From: Jon Mason on 27 Jul 2010 17:40
On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:43:08PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Use pr_fmt, pr_<level> and netdev_<level> where appropriate.
> Use direct printing of logging messages to save text.
>
> Reduces object size ~ 4k or 20k.
>
> (x86 defconfig with vxge)
> $ size drivers/net/vxge/built-in.o*
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 68463 784 8 69255 10e87 drivers/net/vxge/built-in.o.new
> 72417 784 8 73209 11df9 drivers/net/vxge/built-in.o.old
>
> (x86 allyesconfig)
> $ size drivers/net/vxge/built-in.o.*
> text data bss dec hex filename
> 125843 1039 27528 154410 25b2a drivers/net/vxge/built-in.o.new
> 142589 1039 31024 174652 2aa3c drivers/net/vxge/built-in.o.old
>
> Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <joe(a)perches.com>

I have a similar patch queued internally (pending testing).

> ---
> drivers/net/vxge/vxge-config.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++----------------------
> drivers/net/vxge/vxge-main.c | 27 +++++++++++----------------
> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-config.h b/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-config.h
> index 1a94343..dfe0e2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-config.h
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-config.h
> @@ -20,12 +20,8 @@
> #define VXGE_CACHE_LINE_SIZE 128
> #endif
>
> -#define vxge_os_vaprintf(level, mask, fmt, ...) { \
> - char buff[255]; \
> - snprintf(buff, 255, fmt, __VA_ARGS__); \
> - printk(buff); \
> - printk("\n"); \
> -}
> +#define vxge_os_vaprintf(level, mask, fmt, ...) \
> + printk(fmt "\n", ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
> #ifndef VXGE_ALIGN
> #define VXGE_ALIGN(adrs, size) \
> @@ -2228,7 +2224,6 @@ vxge_hw_vpath_strip_fcs_check(struct __vxge_hw_device *hldev, u64 vpath_mask);
> * vxge_debug
> * @level: level of debug verbosity.
> * @mask: mask for the debug
> - * @buf: Circular buffer for tracing
> * @fmt: printf like format string
> *
> * Provides logging facilities. Can be customized on per-module
> @@ -2238,24 +2233,23 @@ vxge_hw_vpath_strip_fcs_check(struct __vxge_hw_device *hldev, u64 vpath_mask);
> * See also: enum vxge_debug_level{}.
> */
>
> -#define vxge_trace_aux(level, mask, fmt, ...) \
> -{\
> - vxge_os_vaprintf(level, mask, fmt, __VA_ARGS__);\
> -}
> +#define vxge_trace_aux(level, mask, fmt, ...) \
> + vxge_os_vaprintf(level, mask, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
>
> -#define vxge_debug(module, level, mask, fmt, ...) { \
> -if ((level >= VXGE_TRACE && ((module & VXGE_DEBUG_TRACE_MASK) == module)) || \
> - (level >= VXGE_ERR && ((module & VXGE_DEBUG_ERR_MASK) == module))) {\
> - if ((mask & VXGE_DEBUG_MASK) == mask)\
> - vxge_trace_aux(level, mask, fmt, __VA_ARGS__); \
> -} \
> -}
> +#define vxge_debug(module, level, mask, fmt, ...) \
> +do { \
> + if ((level >= VXGE_TRACE && \
> + ((module & VXGE_DEBUG_TRACE_MASK) == module)) || \
> + (level >= VXGE_ERR && \
> + ((module & VXGE_DEBUG_ERR_MASK) == module))) { \
> + if ((mask & VXGE_DEBUG_MASK) == mask) \
> + vxge_trace_aux(level, mask, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__); \
> + } \
> +} while (0)
>
> #if (VXGE_COMPONENT_LL & VXGE_DEBUG_MODULE_MASK)
> -#define vxge_debug_ll(level, mask, fmt, ...) \
> -{\
> - vxge_debug(VXGE_COMPONENT_LL, level, mask, fmt, __VA_ARGS__);\
> -}
> +#define vxge_debug_ll(level, mask, fmt, ...) \
> + vxge_debug(VXGE_COMPONENT_LL, level, mask, fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)

Why not make the entire vxge_debug part of vxge_debug_ll? If
disabled, that code can be removed completely as it is unnecessary.
Also, why not call printk directly from vxge_debug? This code had too
many levels of indirection before, remove all of them (as that is way
I did in the internal patch).

> #else
> #define vxge_debug_ll(level, mask, fmt, ...)
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-main.c b/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-main.c
> index 94d87e8..c7c5605 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/vxge/vxge-main.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
> *
> ******************************************************************************/
>
> +#define pr_fmt(fmt) KBUILD_MODNAME ": " fmt
> +
> #include <linux/if_vlan.h>
> #include <linux/pci.h>
> #include <linux/slab.h>
> @@ -144,7 +146,7 @@ vxge_callback_link_up(struct __vxge_hw_device *hldev)
>
> vxge_debug_entryexit(VXGE_TRACE, "%s: %s:%d",
> vdev->ndev->name, __func__, __LINE__);
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: Link Up\n", vdev->ndev->name);
> + netdev_notice(vdev->ndev, "Link Up\n");
> vdev->stats.link_up++;
>
> netif_carrier_on(vdev->ndev);
> @@ -168,7 +170,7 @@ vxge_callback_link_down(struct __vxge_hw_device *hldev)
>
> vxge_debug_entryexit(VXGE_TRACE,
> "%s: %s:%d", vdev->ndev->name, __func__, __LINE__);
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: Link Down\n", vdev->ndev->name);
> + netdev_notice(vdev->ndev, "Link Down\n");
>
> vdev->stats.link_down++;
> netif_carrier_off(vdev->ndev);
> @@ -2679,7 +2681,7 @@ vxge_open(struct net_device *dev)
>
> if (vxge_hw_device_link_state_get(vdev->devh) == VXGE_HW_LINK_UP) {
> netif_carrier_on(vdev->ndev);
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: Link Up\n", vdev->ndev->name);
> + netdev_notice(vdev->ndev, "Link Up\n");
> vdev->stats.link_up++;
> }
>
> @@ -2817,7 +2819,7 @@ int do_vxge_close(struct net_device *dev, int do_io)
> }
>
> netif_carrier_off(vdev->ndev);
> - printk(KERN_NOTICE "%s: Link Down\n", vdev->ndev->name);
> + netdev_notice(vdev->ndev, "Link Down\n");
> netif_tx_stop_all_queues(vdev->ndev);
>
> /* Note that at this point xmit() is stopped by upper layer */
> @@ -3844,9 +3846,7 @@ static pci_ers_result_t vxge_io_slot_reset(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> struct vxgedev *vdev = netdev_priv(netdev);
>
> if (pci_enable_device(pdev)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: "
> - "Cannot re-enable device after reset\n",
> - VXGE_DRIVER_NAME);
> + netdev_err(netdev, "Cannot re-enable device after reset\n");
> return PCI_ERS_RESULT_DISCONNECT;
> }
>
> @@ -3871,9 +3871,8 @@ static void vxge_io_resume(struct pci_dev *pdev)
>
> if (netif_running(netdev)) {
> if (vxge_open(netdev)) {
> - printk(KERN_ERR "%s: "
> - "Can't bring device back up after reset\n",
> - VXGE_DRIVER_NAME);
> + netdev_err(netdev,
> + "Can't bring device back up after reset\n");
> return;
> }
> }
> @@ -4430,13 +4429,9 @@ static int __init
> vxge_starter(void)
> {
> int ret = 0;
> - char version[32];
> - snprintf(version, 32, "%s", DRV_VERSION);
>
> - printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Copyright(c) 2002-2010 Exar Corp.\n",
> - VXGE_DRIVER_NAME);
> - printk(KERN_INFO "%s: Driver version: %s\n",
> - VXGE_DRIVER_NAME, version);
> + pr_info("Copyright(c) 2002-2010 Exar Corp.\n");
> + pr_info("Driver version: %s\n", DRV_VERSION);
>
> verify_bandwidth();

I did not have any of these changes in my patch. If you want to push
this seperately, I ack it.

Thanks,
Jon

>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Joe Perches on 27 Jul 2010 17:50
On Tue, 2010-07-27 at 16:38 -0500, Jon Mason wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 01:43:08PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> > Use direct printing of logging messages to save text.
> I have a similar patch queued internally (pending testing).

Great.

[]

> Why not make the entire vxge_debug part of vxge_debug_ll? If
> disabled, that code can be removed completely as it is unnecessary.
> Also, why not call printk directly from vxge_debug? This code had too
> many levels of indirection before, remove all of them (as that is way
> I did in the internal patch).

'cause I don't really want to figure out the nesting,
I just want it to be smaller and easier to understand.

> I did not have any of these changes in my patch. If you want to push
> this seperately, I ack it.

I'll resend separately.

cheers, Joe

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [PATCH] USB: cp210x: Add four new device IDs
Next: Getting error message "Cannot read inode bitmap". Someone able to help?