dspam install
in [Ports]
|
From: Jim Pazarena on 11 Jul 2010 16:51 tried to make mail/dspam and it exits nagging that it requires MySQL 5.0 client, where I have MySQL 5.1 Is there a way to convince the dspam routine that 5.1 is acceptable? (presuming that it IS). Thanks. _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Sahil Tandon on 11 Jul 2010 17:28 On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 13:51:51 -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote: > tried to make mail/dspam and it exits nagging that it > requires MySQL 5.0 client, where I have MySQL 5.1 > > Is there a way to convince the dspam routine that > 5.1 is acceptable? (presuming that it IS). Yes, 'make config' and choose MYSQL51 (MYSQL50 is the default). Or: % make WITH_MYSQL51=1 WITHOUT_MYSQL50=1 -- Sahil Tandon <sahil(a)FreeBSD.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: David DEMELIER on 12 Jul 2010 15:28 2010/7/11 Sahil Tandon <sahil(a)freebsd.org>: > On Sun, 2010-07-11 at 13:51:51 -0700, Jim Pazarena wrote: > >> tried to make mail/dspam and it exits nagging that it >> requires MySQL 5.0 client, where I have MySQL 5.1 >> >> Is there a way to convince the dspam routine that >> 5.1 is acceptable? (presuming that it IS). > > Yes, 'make config' and choose MYSQL51 (MYSQL50 is the default). Â Or: > > % make WITH_MYSQL51=1 WITHOUT_MYSQL50=1 > > -- > Sahil Tandon <sahil(a)FreeBSD.org> > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org" > I think this : ..ifdef(WITH_MYSQL40) WANT_MYSQL_VER= 40 #PKGNAMESUFFIX= -mysql40 ..elifdef(WITH_MYSQL41) WANT_MYSQL_VER= 41 #PKGNAMESUFFIX= -mysql41 ..elifndef(WITHOUT_MYSQL50) WANT_MYSQL_VER= 50 #PKGNAMESUFFIX= -mysql50 ..elifdef(WITH_MYSQL51) WANT_MYSQL_VER= 51 #PKGNAMESUFFIX= -mysql51 ..elifdef(WITH_MYSQL55) WANT_MYSQL_VER= 55 #PKGNAMESUFFIX= -mysql55 ..endif could be replaced by : ..if defined(WITH_MYSQL) WANT_MYSQL_VER= 55 ... ..endif Then if the user wants a different version he still can change using : WITH_MYSQL_VER= 44. Why don't keep it simple and simple? And why don't use things how they should be used? I think there is still a lot of problems in many ports. We must make a big KISS cleanup in the ports tree to make it as good as NetBSD' pkgsrc. Kind regards. -- Demelier David _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: Sahil Tandon on 12 Jul 2010 19:04 On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 21:28:56 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: > .if defined(WITH_MYSQL) > WANT_MYSQL_VER= 55 ... > .endif > > Then if the user wants a different version he still can change using : > WITH_MYSQL_VER= 44. That change by itself will not work because in bsd.database.mk: .if defined(WITH_MYSQL_VER) && ${WITH_MYSQL_VER} != ${WANT_MYSQL_VER} IGNORE= ... > Why don't keep it simple and simple? I am not sure what you mean. Complexity is not a goal of the project. If you have an idea that does not forfeit existing functionality or violate POLA, please submit it as a patch. > And why don't use things how they should be used? Once again, I am confused by your question. Please clarify your meaning. > I think there is still a lot of problems in many ports. I think we all agree that there is room for improvement. Since you have identified many problems, I look forward to your PRs. > We must make a big KISS cleanup in the ports tree to make it as good > as NetBSD' pkgsrc. Please send PRs or provide specific details; general comments like the above are not helpful. -- Sahil Tandon <sahil(a)FreeBSD.org> _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org"
From: David DEMELIER on 13 Jul 2010 03:46
2010/7/13 Sahil Tandon <sahil(a)freebsd.org>: > On Mon, 2010-07-12 at 21:28:56 +0200, David DEMELIER wrote: > >> .if defined(WITH_MYSQL) >> WANT_MYSQL_VER= 55 ... >> .endif >> >> Then if the user wants a different version he still can change using : >> WITH_MYSQL_VER= 44. > > That change by itself will not work because in bsd.database.mk: > > Â .if defined(WITH_MYSQL_VER) && ${WITH_MYSQL_VER} != ${WANT_MYSQL_VER} > Â IGNORE= ... > Then, explain me why do both php5 and php5-pgsql have not KNOBS/OPTIONS like dspam and work with this variable WITH_PGSQL_VER ? $ pwd /usr/ports/databases/php5-pgsql $ WITH_PGSQL_VER=83 make all-depends-list /usr/ports/lang/php5 [...] /usr/ports/databases/postgresql83-client [...] $ WITH_PGSQL_VER=84 make all-depends-list /usr/ports/lang/php5 [...] /usr/ports/databases/postgresql84-client [...] >> Why don't keep it simple and simple? > > I am not sure what you mean. Â Complexity is not a goal of the project. > If you have an idea that does not forfeit existing functionality or > violate POLA, please submit it as a patch. > >> And why don't use things how they should be used? > > Once again, I am confused by your question. Â Please clarify your > meaning. > Because I meant, if someone made these KNOBS, that's would suppose they should be used. As shown just above it works with php5-pgsql. So if a variable could be used to specify a specific version, it must be used instead of a couple of option that set the package version. I think WITH_MYSQL_VER and WITH_PGSQL_VER were made for that. (There is one for apache too) >> I think there is still a lot of problems in many ports. > > I think we all agree that there is room for improvement. Â Since you have > identified many problems, I look forward to your PRs. > >> We must make a big KISS cleanup in the ports tree to make it as good >> as NetBSD' pkgsrc. > > Please send PRs or provide specific details; general comments like the > above are not helpful. Yes sometime I'm nasty with people, I'm sorry about that but when I saw this port I just didn't understand. I apologize for my english. -- Demelier David _______________________________________________ freebsd-ports(a)freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscribe(a)freebsd.org" |