Prev: PLAY RACE GAMES
Next: FAQ Topic - Why does 1+1 equal 11? or How do I convert a string to a number? (2010-05-30)
From: DL on 29 May 2010 18:36 Hello, What I intend to do is to give a textarea 60% of a browser window's height and width respectively. Here's how my current page look like in a nutshell. At top, the CSS section has the following line: body { height:100%; widht:100%} /* purpose: to prepare for the relative width and height call from the textarea element */ In the middle of the page, it includes a subpage which contains the Textarea element and here's how the textarea element look like: <textarea id="txt" name="txt" style="height:60%;width:60%"></textarea> // this subpage needs to be a separate entity. But the above specified width and height for the Textarea is not recognized. Also, the current page (main page) used quite a few CSS scripts for a third party tool, that is, extJS... What's wrong? How do we solve it? Thanks in advance.
From: Dr_Kral on 29 May 2010 20:29 On Sat, 29 May 2010 15:36:49 -0700 (PDT), DL <tatata9999(a)gmail.com> wrote in <127b500a-be4e-4fce-8053-640f36106b51(a)v29g2000prb.googlegroups.com>: >Hello, > >What I intend to do is to give a textarea 60% of a browser window's >height and width respectively. > >Here's how my current page look like in a nutshell. >At top, the CSS section has the following line: >body { height:100%; widht:100%} spelling? >/* purpose: to prepare for the relative width and height >call from the textarea element >*/ > >In the middle of the page, it includes a subpage which contains the >Textarea element >and here's how the textarea element look like: ><textarea id="txt" name="txt" style="height:60%;width:60%"></textarea> What is the 60% of ?? >// this subpage needs to be a separate entity. > >But the above specified width and height for the Textarea is not >recognized. width spec works >Also, the current page (main page) used quite a few CSS scripts for a >third party tool, that is, extJS... > >What's wrong? How do we solve it? Define it rationally (in em or px) or relative to screen size or use rows/cols spec. > >Thanks in advance. YW
From: badl on 29 May 2010 20:31 On Sat, 29 May 2010 15:36:49 -0700 (PDT), DL <tatata9999(a)gmail.com> wrote in <127b500a-be4e-4fce-8053-640f36106b51(a)v29g2000prb.googlegroups.com>: >Hello, > >What I intend to do is to give a textarea 60% of a browser window's >height and width respectively. > >Here's how my current page look like in a nutshell. >At top, the CSS section has the following line: >body { height:100%; widht:100%} spelling? >/* purpose: to prepare for the relative width and height >call from the textarea element >*/ > >In the middle of the page, it includes a subpage which contains the >Textarea element >and here's how the textarea element look like: ><textarea id="txt" name="txt" style="height:60%;width:60%"></textarea> What is the 60% of ?? >// this subpage needs to be a separate entity. > >But the above specified width and height for the Textarea is not >recognized. width spec works >Also, the current page (main page) used quite a few CSS scripts for a >third party tool, that is, extJS... > >What's wrong? How do we solve it? Define it rationally (in em or px) or relative to screen size or use rows/cols spec. > >Thanks in advance. YW
From: DL on 29 May 2010 21:53 On May 29, 8:29 pm, Dr_K...(a)nyc.rr.com.invalid wrote: > On Sat, 29 May 2010 15:36:49 -0700 (PDT), DL <tatata9...(a)gmail.com> wrote > in <127b500a-be4e-4fce-8053-640f36106...(a)v29g2000prb.googlegroups.com>: > > > > >Hello, > > >What I intend to do is to give a textarea 60% of a browser window's > >height and width respectively. > > >Here's how my current page look like in a nutshell. > >At top, the CSS section has the following line: > >body { height:100%; widht:100%} > spelling? > >/* purpose: to prepare for the relative width and height > >call from the textarea element > >*/ > > >In the middle of the page, it includes a subpage which contains the > >Textarea element > >and here's how the textarea element look like: > ><textarea id="txt" name="txt" style="height:60%;width:60%"></textarea> > > What is the 60% of ?? > > >// this subpage needs to be a separate entity. > > >But the above specified width and height for the Textarea is not > >recognized. > > width spec works > > >Also, the current page (main page) used quite a few CSS scripts for a > >third party tool, that is, extJS... > > >What's wrong? How do we solve it? > > Define it rationally (in em or px) or relative to screen size or use > rows/cols spec. > > >Thanks in advance. > > YW " or relative to screen size " How do we do that within the context I mentioned? Thanks.
From: DL on 29 May 2010 23:02
On May 29, 9:53 pm, DL <tatata9...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On May 29, 8:29 pm, Dr_K...(a)nyc.rr.com.invalid wrote: > > > > > On Sat, 29 May 2010 15:36:49 -0700 (PDT), DL <tatata9...(a)gmail.com> wrote > > in <127b500a-be4e-4fce-8053-640f36106...(a)v29g2000prb.googlegroups.com>: > > > >Hello, > > > >What I intend to do is to give a textarea 60% of a browser window's > > >height and width respectively. > > > >Here's how my current page look like in a nutshell. > > >At top, the CSS section has the following line: > > >body { height:100%; widht:100%} > > spelling? > > >/* purpose: to prepare for the relative width and height > > >call from the textarea element > > >*/ > > > >In the middle of the page, it includes a subpage which contains the > > >Textarea element > > >and here's how the textarea element look like: > > ><textarea id="txt" name="txt" style="height:60%;width:60%"></textarea> > > > What is the 60% of ?? > > > >// this subpage needs to be a separate entity. > > > >But the above specified width and height for the Textarea is not > > >recognized. > > > width spec works > > > >Also, the current page (main page) used quite a few CSS scripts for a > > >third party tool, that is, extJS... > > > >What's wrong? How do we solve it? > > > Define it rationally (in em or px) or relative to screen size or use > > rows/cols spec. > > > >Thanks in advance. > > > YW > > " > or relative to screen size > " > How do we do that within the context I mentioned? > > Thanks. Never mind. I've solved the problem. |