From: "Kevin Grittner" on 2 Aug 2010 10:21 Sushant Sinha <sushant354(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Yes thats what I am planning to do. I just wanted to see if anyone > can help me in estimating whether this is doable in the current > parser or I need to write a new one. If possible, then some idea > on how to go about implementing? The current tsearch parser is a state machine which does clunky mode switches to handle special cases like you describe. If you're looking at doing very much in there, you might want to consider a rewrite to something based on regular expressions. See discussion in these threads: http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/200912102005.16560.andres(a)anarazel.de http://archives.postgresql.org/message-id/4B210D9E020000250002D344(a)gw.wicourts.gov That was actually at the top of my personal PostgreSQL TODO list (after my current project is wrapped up), but I wouldn't complain if someone else wanted to take it. :-) -Kevin -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
|
Pages: 1 Prev: [HACKERS] Where in the world is Itagaki Takahiro? Next: Develop item from TODO list |