From: nospam on
In article <hds98t$8g0$2(a)news.eternal-september.org>, Justin
<justin(a)nobecauseihatespam.com> wrote:

> > Just curious: What would you use it for if you could? Fixing problems
> > with Linux disks?
>
> I would like to be prepared. If a client sends me a hard drive
> formatted to ext3, points a gun to my head and tells me to read from it.
> It isn't a problem *yet* but its something that I can see an an issue in
> the future.

maybe you should find clients who are a bit less violent. or just send
them to someone else and let them point the gun at them.
From: Paul Sture on
In article <161120090935257674%bruck(a)math.usc.edu>,
Ronald Bruck <bruck(a)math.usc.edu> wrote:

> I suppose you could use it to share data between your MacOS X and your
> Linux partitions. But I dunno why; I keep a small volume formatted as
> (shudder!) fat32 for this purpose. Both OS X and Linux recognize it.

I agree that this is sometimes the way to go (I used FAT16 on a dual
boot NT4/Linux system, since NT4 didn't understand FAT32).

Just be aware of the file size limitations on FAT32.

<http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314463>

"You cannot create a file larger than (2^32)-1 bytes (this is one byte
less than 4 GB) on a FAT32 partition."

--
Paul Sture
From: Justin on
Paul Sture wrote:
> In article <161120090935257674%bruck(a)math.usc.edu>,
> Ronald Bruck <bruck(a)math.usc.edu> wrote:
>
>> I suppose you could use it to share data between your MacOS X and your
>> Linux partitions. But I dunno why; I keep a small volume formatted as
>> (shudder!) fat32 for this purpose. Both OS X and Linux recognize it.
>
> I agree that this is sometimes the way to go (I used FAT16 on a dual
> boot NT4/Linux system, since NT4 didn't understand FAT32).
>
> Just be aware of the file size limitations on FAT32.
>
> <http://support.microsoft.com/kb/314463>
>
> "You cannot create a file larger than (2^32)-1 bytes (this is one byte
> less than 4 GB) on a FAT32 partition."
>

I create files bigger than 4GB on a daily basis in video editing.
fat32 is not an option.
exfat would be nice, but of course MS won't release the specs - it will
have to be reverse engineered.
Like I said, NTFS on jump drives is working for now, but I like to have
options.