From: dan73 on
>Dan , which part of

>"It will take only a few days on any modern PC using
>GNFS."

>didn't you understand ? x)

>lol

>tommy1729

I had it wrong also, even with GNFS it is going
to take more than just a few days!

It is still chugging along on the ECM
after 6 + days but if GNFS is more than
twice as fast as ECM, it is possible GNFS could
factor it in a few days.
I never used that algorithm (GNFS) but it
is better to use on larger composites like this
one rather than ECM or so I have read!

Is there any free GNFS software for the Python
language out there?

Dan
From: factorboy13 on
> I had it wrong also, even with GNFS it is going
> to take more than just a few days!
> Dan

I don't think it will take more than a couple of hours to factor it with ggnfs (only 112 decimal digits).
I will do try it now and will post the factors here
From: factorboy13 on
Factored
3141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406286208998628034825342117067982148086513 (112 digits)

prp43 factor: 1215666422974078739455530964256912318288897
prp70 factor: 2584255511395974781222544726762221278238062155282351848420786629580529
elapsed time 00:03:10
From: dan73 on
>Factored
>31415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209>74944592307816406286208998628034825342117067982148086513 (112 digits)

>prp43 factor: >1215666422974078739455530964256912318288897
>prp70 factor: >25842555113959747812225447267622212782380621552823518484>20786629580529
>elapsed time 00:03:10

This was allready factored ---

See "more on factoring floor(pi*(10^111))
posted on 16th nov.
Dan
From: factorboy13 on
> This was allready factored ---
>
> See "more on factoring floor(pi*(10^111))
> posted on 16th nov.
> Dan

Ah ok. You took a significant time but is normal with ECM when a factor is of this size.