Prev: Special Issue on Cognitive Information Processing
Next: energy conservation in linear-nonlinear systems
From: niyander on 30 Jul 2010 13:14 hi, can anyone tell me how to perform 2d fft? what i understood for 2d fft is that for each rows we perform individual fft's and place the result on the respective rows and similarly for the columns. what i mean is suppose i have an array of 2d data as: 0000 0110 0110 0000 now what i am trying to do is calculate fft (4 point fft instead of 16 point fft) of the first row (0000) and place the result in first row, calculate the fft for the second row (0110) and place the result in second row and so on. similarly for column calculate the fft for first column (0000) and place the result in the first column and so on. so will this work and will i get the same result as of 16 point fft? thanks
From: glen herrmannsfeldt on 30 Jul 2010 17:34
niyander <mightycatniyander(a)gmail.com> wrote: > can anyone tell me how to perform 2d fft? what i understood for 2d fft > is that for each rows we perform individual fft's and place the result > on the respective rows and similarly for the columns. what i mean is > suppose i have an array of 2d data as: > 0000 > 0110 > 0110 > 0000 The FFT is separable in rectangular coordinates. You separately do the X and Y transforms, in either order, to get the appropriate XY (2D) transform. > now what i am trying to do is calculate fft (4 point fft instead of 16 > point fft) of the first row (0000) and place the result in first row, > calculate the fft for the second row (0110) and place the result in > second row and so on. similarly for column calculate the fft for first > column (0000) and place the result in the first column and so on. so > will this work and will i get the same result as of 16 point fft? No, it is different from a 16 point 1D FFT on the data, but it is the right transform for 2D data. If you think about the normal modes for a square drum head then you will have some idea about the results of the transform. -- glen |