Prev: [PATCH] firewire: core: check for 1394a compliant IRM, fix inaccessibility of Sony camcorder
Next: Frontswap (was Transcendent Memory): overview
From: Stefan Richter on 30 May 2010 14:10 > Per IEEE 1394 clause 8.4.2.3, a contender for the IRM role shall check > whether the current IRM complies to 1394a-2000 or later. If not force a > compliant node (e.g. itself) to become IRM. This was implemented in the > older ieee1394 driver but not yet in firewire-core. While I don't have an IRM that features the DCR-TRV25 bug, I did at least quick tests of the patch with the following consistent results: - Joined three nodes to a bus, only one node of them IRM capable, but being a 1394-1995-only implementation. - Plugged in Linux node into this bus, got the following log: firewire_ohci: isochronous cycle inconsistent firewire_core: created device fw8: GUID 00d04b21010212c8, S400 firewire_core: created device fw9: GUID 008088030960484b, S100 firewire_core: phy config: card 4, new root=ffc3, gap_count=7 firewire_core: IRM is not 1394a compliant, making local node (ffc1) root. firewire_core: phy config: card 4, new root=ffc1, gap_count=7 and all is well as far as kernel, gscanbus, and Kino can tell. -- Stefan Richter -=====-==-=- -=-= ====- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |