From: Dmitry Torokhov on 22 Apr 2010 20:20 On Thu, Apr 22, 2010 at 05:01:06PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:49:29PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > > Both these structures have the same lifetime rules so instead of allocating > > and managing them separately embed struct device into struct firmware_priv. > > Also make sure to delete sysfs attributes ourselves instead of expecting > > sysfs to clean up our mess. > > This one didn't apply due to other changes that have happened to the > file since you sent this out. Care to respin it? > I'll wait till next next release, see what's there and resping what's missing. Thanks. -- Dmitry -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Greg KH on 22 Apr 2010 20:20 On Sat, Mar 13, 2010 at 11:49:29PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > Both these structures have the same lifetime rules so instead of allocating > and managing them separately embed struct device into struct firmware_priv. > Also make sure to delete sysfs attributes ourselves instead of expecting > sysfs to clean up our mess. This one didn't apply due to other changes that have happened to the file since you sent this out. Care to respin it? thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
|
Pages: 1 Prev: p9auth: add p9auth driver Next: [PATCH] e100: expose broadcast_disabled as a module option |