Prev: Godels theorem ends in paradox-simple proof
Next: Godels theorem ends in paradox-simple proof
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 27 May 2010 02:20

To create a 3D iron filings with magnet experiment you simply need a
glass jar with
lid and the filings inside and the magnet on the outside. There is a
fancy toy that
does this experiment of a enclosed plastic box with the magnet nestled
in between.
But to duplicate the experiment is cheaply done with a glass jar,
filings and magnet.

Now what I am calling the tubes formed is that there are spacers
between what
can be called filaments or ropes or strings of filings. The central
mass of filings
nearest the magnet is not able to discern these voids between the
filaments.

Now I suspect physics has some formal name for these structures of
filings as
ropes or strings. Possibly even borrowed terms from geology to
describe these
filaments of filings, such as perhaps "eskars". Or perhaps the shapes
have
been connotated as "whiskers of filings". I shall use the terms ropes
or filaments
or tubes of filings.

Now I wonder if anyone has ever bothered to construct a microscope
peering into
the magnet and iron filings formation. Whether anyone allied a
microscope with
these experiments of the magnetic lines of force. Or as I called them
tubes
of force in 3D?

One can see the tubes on the outlying filings, not the central mass of
filings closest
to the magnet.

And I played around with a smaller magnet with a few amount of filings
and was able
to have a sort of ensemble of these ropy or stringy filings move
around. Now I suspect
the reason there is "empty space" between these tubes or ropes of
filings, is because
the magnetic field creates a vortex of emptiness between successive
tubes or ropes
of filings. And the ropes or tubes seem to have some coherent
integrity for they move
as "one body".

So can we devise an advanced experiment that allys the microscope with
these
filings so that we can see an "in close view" of these ropes or
filaments of filings
and the voids in between?

Now a Big Bang theory of an explosion also has voids and emptiness
between that
of the conglomeration of matter. But an explosion pattern is far far
different from the
pattern of a magnet and EM. The fact that the Voids of astronomy such
as the
Fornax Void or the Capricornus Void and their neighborhood of voids is
explained
not by an explosion effect but rather by the action of a Cosmic
magnetic field.

When I take a less powerful magnet and play around with only a few
iron filings,
I can make them almost move around as if they were soldiers marching
in
a formation, all of them keeping a certain distance apart from their
neighbor.
And this reminds me of the Jarrett mapping of the galaxies that the
voids and
galaxies seem to have that integral cohesion of galaxies with voids
precisely
spaced. For take a look again at this website:


http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/nearsc.html


http://www.atlasoftheuniverse.com/wnearsc.gif

For it appears as though the Voids are precision placed such as a
magetic lines
of force.

But perhaps the most striking resemblance are the superclusters such
as the P-P
as long filaments or tubes or whiskers of galaxies. It seems as though
all the
superclusters and walls are long whiskers of galaxies.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Godels theorem ends in paradox-simple proof
Next: Godels theorem ends in paradox-simple proof