From: Richard Maher on

"rf" <rf(a)z.invalid> wrote in message
news:mGV8n.4470$pv.2108(a)news-server.bigpond.net.au...
>
> "Richard Maher" <maher_rj(a)hotspamnotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:hk04i8$bt$1(a)news-01.bur.connect.com.au...
> > Hi,
> >
> > Does anyone know what might cause the above error to be thrown from a
> > myFun.apply(this,stuf) call?
>
> What above error?
>

Not sure what newsgroup reader you're using but in everyone I've seen you'll
find a subject line or title for my post that says: -
" func.apply() throws Error -2147467259"

But if it helps clarify things the error is caught and rethrown in
Tier3Client.js (which was included as a response to my original post) circa
line 188 character 24. The exception "name" was "Error" and the "number"
was -2147467259. All other attributes were unavailable and toString()
revealed [object Error]

So, in a nutshell, when I try to call (apply) the user's callback routine
IE8/Windows says no but won't say why. I was hoping someone could tell me
some great debugging option that might reveal additional information about
the "Error" or perhaps some buttons/quotas to push that might reval more.

Please note that this could be a timing/collision thing, as upping the
number of EmpPickers to 5 results in attrition of employees back to zero.
The "good" news is that the rendezvous() function must have been called (and
the JAVA console backs that up) or the browser would hang very quickly so
I'm off to see how far in positionDiv the code gets.

Stack Limit?

Maybe each DIV get's displayed the same amount of times before bombing?

Some recurrsiveness I'm missing?

Oh well, I guess I was just hoping that "Error -2147467259" wasn't as
generic as it looks and it might have rung a bell with someone. I'd better
roll up the sleaves. . .
>
>

Regards Richard Maher


From: Lew on
Richard Maher wrote:
> Not sure what newsgroup reader you're using but in everyone I've seen you'll
> find a subject line or title for my post that says: -
> " func.apply() throws Error -2147467259"

It's a good idea to repeat the subject or question in the body of the post,
and it's courteous, too. One practical benefit is that the context can
survive a subject change.

--
Lew
From: John B. Matthews on
In article <hk2ma6$bdo$1(a)news-01.bur.connect.com.au>,
"Richard Maher" <maher_rj(a)hotspamnotmail.com> wrote:

> Oh well, I guess I was just hoping that "Error -2147467259" wasn't as
> generic as it looks and it might have rung a bell with someone. I'd better
> roll up the sleaves. . .

-2147467259 = 0x80004005 = 10000000000000000100000000000101

I doubt it means anything, but I've seen systems that use high order
bits to segregate groups of errors, incorporate legacy errors or encode
multiple errors as a set.

OTOH, this may lead somewhere:

<http://www.google.com/search?q=80004005>

--
John B. Matthews
trashgod at gmail dot com
<http://sites.google.com/site/drjohnbmatthews>