Prev: linux-next: build warning after merge of the final tree (in Linus' tree)
Next: [PATCHv2 3/4] tracing: graph output support for preemptirqsoff/preemptoff tracers
From: David Miller on 10 Mar 2010 02:20 From: Johannes Weiner <hannes(a)cmpxchg.org> Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2010 01:01:21 +0100 > I also found it weird that it makes x86 skip an allocator level that all > the other architectures are using, and replaces it with 'generic' code that > nobody but x86 is using (sparc, powerpc, sh and microblaze appear to have > lib/lmb.c at this stage and for this purpose? lmb was also suggested by > benh [4] but I have to admit I do not understand Yinghai's response to it). It kind of irked me that lmb was passed over for whatever vague reason was given. It works fine with memory hotplug on powerpc, so a lack of hotplug support can't be an argument for not using it. But hey, having yet another early memory allocator instead of making one of the existing ones do what you want, that's fine right? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |