Prev: Happy 20th Hubble!
Next:  What kind of “spin” are you putting on the cue ball ?
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 24 Apr 2010 14:15

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Alright, this is a diffraction pattern of light waves
> on a straightedge

Well the other one looked more like a double-slit diffraction
pattern,
let me make it more like a straightedge diffraction pattern where
the
straightedge is on the rightmost portion:


|;;;|   |;;;;|   |;;;;|  |;;;;;|
|;;;|   |;;;;|   |;;;;|  |;;;;;|
|;;;|   |;;;;|   |;;;;|  |;;;;;|
|;;;|   |;;;;|   |;;;;|  |;;;;;|

> Now looking at these pictures of the galaxies
> of the Universe, one sees that they form a
> diffraction pattern of walls or clusters and then
> voids intervening. So we have dense strips of
> galaxies and then voids in between.


> Below is a list of pictures showing the mapp of
> galaxies. These pictures are probably the finest
> set of pictures in all of astronomy for they are like
> the mapp of what the Cosmos is. Same as an atlas
> is indispensible for geography.


> http://www.astro.princeton.edu/~mjuric/universe/all100.gif


> http://www.astro.princeton.edu/universe/


> http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/jarrett/papers/LSS/


> http://www.astro.princeton.edu/universe/greatwalls.gif

Now let me look through those pictures of Great Walls and Voids of
both Jarrett and Juric that comes closest to matching my diffraction
pattern. I think that Jarrett and Juric are the two most valuable
working
astronomers today, because they are trying to establish "what there
actually
is!" and not like the others who are living in a Big Bang fantasy
dreamworld.


These three items of observation when assembled together:
(i) location of galaxies on a Cosmic mapping
(ii) density of galaxies on that Cosmic mapping
(iii) the variance of ages of galaxies with their neighbors of a
factor of at least 2X the age of a nearby neighbor

Those three factors falsify the Big Bang and the only viable theory
is
the Atom Totality with its Dirac New Radioactivities.


Postscript: Chapter 18: "pi" and "e" and "i" explained; inverse fine
structure constant, and proton to electron mass ratio, speed of light,
all linked
and explained.

Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
(all else snipped)
>
> It is an amazing and awestruck discovery. That the speed of light
> represents
> the meridians of Elliptic geometry and how fast the Hyperbolic
> geometry log-spiral
> can cover them. It is purely geometrical, for the width gets rid of
> all units. It is related
> to the fact that pi is 22/7 whilst "e" is 19/7 so a difference of 3.
>

I meant a difference of 3 subshells from 22 subshells in plutonium
with only
19 occupied.

But the reason I am bringing up the speed of light in a postscript is
that I
"cheated" in the math book where I first covered this idea. Cheated by
using only 5 x 10^3 km for the log-spiral. The circumference of Earth
as meridian is truly about 4 x 10^4 km and the radius is about 6 x
10^3 km.
So why use only 5 x 10^3 km of the log spiral? Well, I have until I
reach
chapter 18 to reconcile using 5 x 10^3 km of the log-spiral. It maybe
that
time in seconds has to be fixed by physics, so that the speed of light
is
not a pure mathematical derivation. I have to get the time factor from
physics
but then the length or distance is determined by the pure math
geometry.

Maybe the answer lies in radius of the log-spiral is 5 x 10^3
seconds,
having replaced the kilometers with time in seconds.

But that I have to use only seconds in all the other speed of light
measures,
where the length or distance can vary.

This is not as spectacular or awestricking as a pure math derivation,
but still
it is profound and spectacular. That one can only have Euclidean,
Elliptic
and Hyperbolic geometries provided that the speed of light is a
measure
of meridian strips/ log spiral = speed of light. The usual formula of
circumference / diameter = pi is only in Euclidean geometry, but the
speed
of light is in all three geometries of symmetry breaking.

So, yes, I cheated since I had to depart the other book, and did not
really
justify my 5 x 10^3 km which would be replaced as 5 x 10^3 seconds. I
knew that number was not going to go anywhere or disappear and that
I could justify it later. Here I am giving myself this time span to
justify it.
So I have until I reach chapter 18 to justify that number. I think, it
probably
comes from the radius of the log-spiral, whereas the radius of earth
would
be 6 x 10^3 km.


Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: Happy 20th Hubble!
Next:  What kind of “spin” are you putting on the cue ball ?