galaxies form a diffraction pattern like a double slit experiment Chapt10, density & distribution of galaxies #228 Atom Totality
in [Math]
|
Prev: Finishing Busy Beaver of 5
Next: FERMATISTS:: WHY IS "(10^2 +9^2)-1 X 2 = (10^2- 9^2)^2-1= 360=360" --- What is the page number in your book?
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 22 Jul 2010 02:31 Chapter 10 Subject: Chapt10 future news-- probably a new wall beyond Sloan I use the history of the Continental Drift theory alot as a model of how the Atom Totality theory will be met socially and how it will replace the Big Bang theory. In the Continental Drift, the deciding evidence was finally the Mid Atlantic Rift of sea floor spreading that clinched the new theory. But what started the Continental Drift theory in the first place was the obvious shape of South America looks like it fits into Africa as jigsaw puzzle. In the same manner, the Atom Totality theory needs the deciding evidence and it is already in-- the cosmic microwave background radiation is blackbody meaning it is the inside of an atom. But the density and distribution of galaxies also point to a Atom Totality in that we have successive bands of dense galaxies with intermittent voids of space. This distribution pattern is what is seen in quantum mechanics as a interference-diffraction pattern of light or electrons shot at a double slit experiment. A Big Bang cannot survive the data of intermittent bands of galaxies with voids. But the mapping of the galaxies is a relatively new science so it cannot be a deciding evidence as of now. I believe we will have a future report saying that there is a larger wall beyond the Sloan Great Wall with a void in between and this would be a further downfall of the Big Bang theory. That no Big Bang explosion could ever give a density and distribution of galaxies that looks like a diffraction pattern of the double-slit experiment. Only atomic physics gives diffraction patterns of density and distribution. And in a sense, our own Solar System with its eerily close ties with the Titius-Bode Rule which one can consider to be a diffraction pattern spacing of planets. The best evidence to prove one theory over another theory is the largest observable piece of evidence and that would be the density and distribution of galaxies. But these observations are relatively new. The issue of the cosmic microwave as blackbody radiation is closed subject. But to me, a highly logical person, all of the evidence put together implies the Big Bang is fake and only the Atom Totality theory can answer each of the evidences. Science of geology had a similar experience in the past. Geology had continental-drift which to a logical person was rather obvious and the evidence was mounting up and mounting up and one wonders how anyone could have been stupid enough to hold out. But they held out by saying they had no mechanism, until the evidence of the sea-floor spreading was given. So in a similar situation of the Atom Totality versus Big Bang, the density and distribution of galaxies is that of the shape of the continents and that they had fit together into plates a long time ago and moved apart. So I think that we may have a repeat of science history of the Continental Drift theory of geology taking slow to become the mainstream theory and that the Atom Totality is taking a long time to replace the Big Bang theory. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |