From: Mycelium on
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:40:32 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:29:31 -0700, Mycelium
><mycelium(a)thematrixattheendofthemushroomstem.org> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:59:32 -0500, Jim Yanik <jyanik(a)abuse.gov> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>TEKTRONIX used tantalums for many years in their scopes,and the failures
>>>were not objectionably high. Usage was mostly on power rails,BTW.
>>
>> Yeah, except that they also used mostly mil spec components and
>>production methodologies back then as well, and one (an engineer) could
>>rely on the fact that they had been thoroughly conditioned before use on
>>the production line.
>>
>> A hermetically sealed mil EL cap has a shelf life of decades. A COTS
>>EL cap does not. There are several mechanisms that are/were in place
>>during their manufacture to ensure that reliability level on those
>>specialized caps, even though they differ little at the
>>physical/electrical level... ie they are both paste laminated foil
>>roll-ups.
>
>Wet-slugs don't detonate like MnO2 dry tantalums. The MIL CLR-types
>are very reliable. They have silver cases, so have gotten expensive.
>
>I don't think these are roll-ups. They are a sintered tantalum slug
>floating in a conductive paste, in a silver can. The semi-liquid paste
>must put the fires out.
>
>John
>

http://www.evanscap.com/hycap.htm
From: John Larkin on
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:42:09 -0700, Mycelium
<mycelium(a)thematrixattheendofthemushroomstem.org> wrote:

>On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:40:32 -0700, John Larkin
><jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:
>
>>On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:29:31 -0700, Mycelium
>><mycelium(a)thematrixattheendofthemushroomstem.org> wrote:
>>
>>>On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 10:59:32 -0500, Jim Yanik <jyanik(a)abuse.gov> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>>TEKTRONIX used tantalums for many years in their scopes,and the failures
>>>>were not objectionably high. Usage was mostly on power rails,BTW.
>>>
>>> Yeah, except that they also used mostly mil spec components and
>>>production methodologies back then as well, and one (an engineer) could
>>>rely on the fact that they had been thoroughly conditioned before use on
>>>the production line.
>>>
>>> A hermetically sealed mil EL cap has a shelf life of decades. A COTS
>>>EL cap does not. There are several mechanisms that are/were in place
>>>during their manufacture to ensure that reliability level on those
>>>specialized caps, even though they differ little at the
>>>physical/electrical level... ie they are both paste laminated foil
>>>roll-ups.
>>
>>Wet-slugs don't detonate like MnO2 dry tantalums. The MIL CLR-types
>>are very reliable. They have silver cases, so have gotten expensive.
>>
>>I don't think these are roll-ups. They are a sintered tantalum slug
>>floating in a conductive paste, in a silver can. The semi-liquid paste
>>must put the fires out.
>>
>>John
>>
>
>http://www.evanscap.com/hycap.htm

$88 each. Cool.

John


From: Mycelium on
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:44:48 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>$88 each. Cool.


So, you can read ads and do math. Me too.
From: Mycelium on
On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:44:48 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote:

>On Wed, 09 Jun 2010 16:42:09 -0700, Mycelium
><mycelium(a)thematrixattheendofthemushroomstem.org> wrote:

>>
>>http://www.evanscap.com/hycap.htm
>
>$88 each. Cool.
>
>John
>
Made in the USA for the use of USA customers only.

Keep a hard working US cap maker employed today, buy Evans' capacitors!
From: JosephKK on
On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 11:24:46 -0400, Phil Hobbs
<pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net> wrote:

>On 6/4/2010 10:04 AM, John Larkin wrote:
>> On Fri, 04 Jun 2010 09:47:43 -0400, Phil Hobbs
>> <pcdhSpamMeSenseless(a)electrooptical.net> wrote:
>>
>>> Stupid title, but actual useful info on tantalum cap behaviour:
>>>
>>> http://www.edn.com/article/509092-What_a_cap_astrophe_.php
>>>
>>> Now that there's this existence proof, maybe there'll be a bit
>>> more...perhaps someone will write them another useful article, e.g. a
>>> compendium of all two-transistor circuits.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>>
>>> Phil Hobbs
>>
>> Tantalums fail from excess current, namely dV/dt. MnO2 is an oxidizer
>> and tantalum is a fuel, and only a tiny ignition source sets it off.
>> They are fine for current-limited applications but firebombs if used
>> to bypass power rails. Derate them 3:1 on voltage if you must use them
>> as power bypasses. Better yet use aluminums, polymer aluminums for
>> wide-temperature appls
>>
>> John
>>
>
>The interesting thing in the article is that soldering makes large tants
>vulnerable to overvoltage failure well below their rating, and that they
>can be reconditioned (and made much more reliable) by putting a current
>limit on the power supply. That's more useful for repairs or fixing
>problems with a shipping product than for new designs, admittedly.
>Still, I thought it was kind of cool, and remarkable for being in EDN!
>
>Cheers
>
>Phil Hobbs

I kind of have to agree, i haven't seen or heard of much stuff that
useful in EDN for over 40 years. Of course i have not been a subscriber
for over 25 years over the lack of content.