From: Rune Allnor on 29 May 2010 08:47 On 29 Mai, 01:50, Frank <fble...(a)yahoo.com> wrote: > Rune.....yes, that's what I was thinking also. Using the equation my > colleague gave me seemed too simple. My hunch is that it's more > complicated. So you are saying instead of taking two incoherent > signals (x and y), and trying to make y coherent with x, start with x, > and "mess with it" until it has the coherence in my model? I don't know. The only use of coherence I have seen, is in applications where one has some analytic model for a signal transmission channel. The real-world channel has a random component (I've worked with underwater acoustics, where the exact details of the ocanography are unknown) and the coherence function is then used as a measure to describe how well the analytic model describes what actually goes on in the data. I can't remember having seen how to generate a signal with prescribed coherence characteristics. Rune
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: Achieving 'equal loudness' for A/B testing Next: symmetric 2D function.... |