geometrical-probability theory #4.22 & #238 Correcting Math & Atom Totality
in [Physics]
|
Prev: turning probability combinations and permutations into geometrical concepts #4.20 & #236 Correcting Math & Atom Totality
Next: Geometrical-probability theory #4.23 & #239 Correcting Math & Atom Totality
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 26 Jul 2010 09:54 Owen Jacobson wrote: > On 2010-07-26 01:19:13 -0400, Archimedes Plutonium said: > > > where there are 10^536 such numbers all having exactly 268 digits > > The problem with this idea should be obvious, even to you. > Perhaps a lucky mistake. Probability theory gives alot of puns, if one is into pun making. Let me rephrase the above to read: Where there are 10^536 such numbers, all having exactly 268 digits in base_268 not base_10 but base_268. Now the question is, in base_10, do I have every number covered from 0 to 10^536 within those permutations of 268 digits in base_268? Has anyone ever asked such a question before? But whether that idea gets me into a geometry outlook is not at all obvious in any sense. Instead it looks as though I am deeper into numbers and algrebra, rather than having converted probability theory into geometry concepts. Archimedes Plutonium http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/ whole entire Universe is just one big atom where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies |