From: purple on
jmfbahciv wrote:
> purple wrote:

>> You can never convince a person whose motivation isn't
>> truth, but misuses information in order to advance
>> their personal agenda.
>
> Honey, everybody has a personal agenda.

Of course we do. Often that agenda is the search for truth.

> The key to
> getting something useful accomplished is to aim
> your people's personal agendas in the same direction
> which is, hopefully, getting the work done.
>
>>
>> There's a one word cure for thoughts that humans are
>> exclusively responsible for climate change, and that
>> word is "Chaos."
>>
>> In short, we can never know.
>
> Since you capitalized Chaos, are you trying to obfusicate
> the issue with another "scientific" magic word?

I assume that's a tongue in cheek obfuscate.

> Chaos theory is a math technique to create patterns.

There's much more to Chaos theory than creating patterns.
From: jmfbahciv on
purple wrote:
> jmfbahciv wrote:
>> purple wrote:
>
>>> You can never convince a person whose motivation isn't
>>> truth, but misuses information in order to advance
>>> their personal agenda.
>>
>> Honey, everybody has a personal agenda.
>
> Of course we do. Often that agenda is the search for truth.

Whose truth?

>
>> The key to
>> getting something useful accomplished is to aim
>> your people's personal agendas in the same direction
>> which is, hopefully, getting the work done.
>>
>>>
>>> There's a one word cure for thoughts that humans are
>>> exclusively responsible for climate change, and that
>>> word is "Chaos."
>>>
>>> In short, we can never know.
>>
>> Since you capitalized Chaos, are you trying to obfusicate
>> the issue with another "scientific" magic word?
>
> I assume that's a tongue in cheek obfuscate.

I was trying to find out what you were talking about...delete
that...now I'm trying to find out if you're worth a nanosecond
of my time.

>
>> Chaos theory is a math technique to create patterns.
>
> There's much more to Chaos theory than creating patterns.

Such as?

/BAH
From: purple on
jmfbahciv wrote:
> purple wrote:
>> jmfbahciv wrote:
>>> purple wrote:
>>
>>>> You can never convince a person whose motivation isn't
>>>> truth, but misuses information in order to advance
>>>> their personal agenda.
>>>
>>> Honey, everybody has a personal agenda.
>>
>> Of course we do. Often that agenda is the search for truth.
>
> Whose truth?
>
Excuse me? Feel free to tell us about your agenda of the
moment. This entire reply of yours has a sense of someone
who got out of the wrong side of the bed this fine Sunday
morning. I hope you're having a better day when you read
my reply.
>
>>
>>> The key to
>>> getting something useful accomplished is to aim
>>> your people's personal agendas in the same direction
>>> which is, hopefully, getting the work done.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> There's a one word cure for thoughts that humans are
>>>> exclusively responsible for climate change, and that
>>>> word is "Chaos."
>>>>
>>>> In short, we can never know.
>>>
>>> Since you capitalized Chaos, are you trying to obfusicate
>>> the issue with another "scientific" magic word?
>>
>> I assume that's a tongue in cheek obfuscate.
>
> I was trying to find out what you were talking about...delete
> that...now I'm trying to find out if you're worth a nanosecond
> of my time.
>
It was worth my time to respond. I have no idea what you
consider worth your while.
>>
>>> Chaos theory is a math technique to create patterns.
>>
>> There's much more to Chaos theory than creating patterns.
>
> Such as?
>
google chaos complex dynamic non-linear systems 302,000 hits
>
But if you want to stick to "creating patterns" feel free to
knock yourself out.
From: Gill Smith on
<jimp(a)specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
news:hqjc07-dmh.ln1(a)mail.specsol.com...
> In sci.physics Gill Smith <gill.smith.999(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>> anyone else not entirely convinced that it is quite the advertised
>> free-lunch?
>>
>> --
>> http://www.gillsmith999.plus.com/
>
> You mean other than it causes earthquakes?
>
> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=geothermal-drilling-earthquakes

wow! didn't think of that one

I just can't get over the idea that geothermal energy is like thermal
aquifers

'draining' them is going to have consequences as dire as falling water
tables

--
http://www.gillsmith999.plus.com/


From: jimp on
In sci.physics Gill Smith <gill.smith.999(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
> <jimp(a)specsol.spam.sux.com> wrote in message
> news:hqjc07-dmh.ln1(a)mail.specsol.com...
>> In sci.physics Gill Smith <gill.smith.999(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
>>> anyone else not entirely convinced that it is quite the advertised
>>> free-lunch?
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://www.gillsmith999.plus.com/
>>
>> You mean other than it causes earthquakes?
>>
>> http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=geothermal-drilling-earthquakes
>
> wow! didn't think of that one
>
> I just can't get over the idea that geothermal energy is like thermal
> aquifers
>
> 'draining' them is going to have consequences as dire as falling water
> tables
>
> --
> http://www.gillsmith999.plus.com/

Umm, no, what apparently happens is the water pumped down to get heated also
lubes the faults, things start slipping, and you get earthquakes.

This has been known for decades but no one wants to acknowledge it since
geothermal energy is "green" and therefor couldn't possibly have undesired
side effects.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

--- news://freenews.netfront.net/ - complaints: news(a)netfront.net ---