Prev: The Fermat primes are factors of the denominators of the Bernoulli numbers 2^(n+1)
Next: Exterior Power Problem
From: master1729 on 14 Dec 2009 05:28
i now have a proof of goldbach.

the tools used resemble that of my proof for RH and infinite prime twins.

some powerfull tools.

regards

tommy1729
From: Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr. on 15 Dec 2009 07:43
On Dec 14, 12:28 pm, master1729 <tommy1...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> i now have a proof of goldbach.
>
> the tools used resemble that of my proof for RH and infinite prime twins.
>
> some powerfull tools.
>
> regards
>
> tommy1729
>

I'll notify the media.

From: Pubkeybreaker on 15 Dec 2009 10:21
On Dec 15, 7:43 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr."
<ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> On Dec 14, 12:28 pm, master1729 <tommy1...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > i now have a proof of goldbach.
>
> > the tools used resemble that of my proof for RH and infinite prime twins.
>
> > some powerfull tools.
>
> > regards
>
> > tommy1729
>
> I'll notify the media.

It would be better to notify the 'men in white'
From: master1729 on 16 Dec 2009 05:42
> On Dec 15, 7:43 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr."
> <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 14, 12:28 pm, master1729
> <tommy1...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > i now have a proof of goldbach.
> >
> > > the tools used resemble that of my proof for RH
> and infinite prime twins.
> >
> > > some powerfull tools.
> >
> > > regards
> >
> > > tommy1729
> >
> > I'll notify the media.
>
> It would be better to notify the 'men in white'

hah !

there are real mathematicians who claimed proof just like me !!

are real mathematicians crazy and bad at math ?!?

i know you wont believe me , so i will give a single example :

H.A. Pogorzelski was a mathematician who circulated a proof of Goldbach's conjecture that is not accepted among math circles. According to his claim in Crelle's Journal, 292, 1977, 1â€"12, the proof depends upon the "Consistency Hypothesis", the "Extended Wittgenstein Thesis", and "Church's Thesis", all of which, no doubt, contributed to its dubious reputation among his peers. He published several paperbacks on the "Transtheoretic Foundations of Mathematics", one of which discussed the Goldbach Conjecture in particular.

Though it may appear otherwise, he was, in fact, a conventionally educated mathematician, receiving his Ph.D. from CUNY in 1969 under the advisor Raymond Smullyan. His dissertation was on "Goldbach Sentences in Some Abstract Arithmetics Constructed from a Generalization of Ordinary Recursive Arithmetic".

---

note that it was NOT DISPROVED.

and i am talking about a REAL MATHEMATICIAN PUBLISHING IN A REAL MATH MAGAZINE WITH PEER REVIEW , YET WAS DISCRIMINATED AND IGNORED BY THE COMMUNITY !!!

or are you going to compare pogorzelski to James Harris or musatov or some nut ?? plz ...


tommy1729
From: master1729 on 16 Dec 2009 05:45
i wrote :

> > On Dec 15, 7:43 am, "Ostap S. B. M. Bender Jr."
> > <ostap_bender_1...(a)hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Dec 14, 12:28 pm, master1729
> > <tommy1...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > > > i now have a proof of goldbach.
> > >
> > > > the tools used resemble that of my proof for
> RH
> > and infinite prime twins.
> > >
> > > > some powerfull tools.
> > >
> > > > regards
> > >
> > > > tommy1729
> > >
> > > I'll notify the media.
> >
> > It would be better to notify the 'men in white'
>
> hah !
>
> there are real mathematicians who claimed proof just
> like me !!
>
> are real mathematicians crazy and bad at math ?!?
>
> i know you wont believe me , so i will give a single
> example :
>
> H.A. Pogorzelski was a mathematician who circulated a
> proof of Goldbach's conjecture that is not accepted
> among math circles. According to his claim in
> Crelle's Journal, 292, 1977, 1â€"12, the proof
> depends upon the "Consistency Hypothesis", the
> "Extended Wittgenstein Thesis", and "Church's
> Thesis", all of which, no doubt, contributed to its
> dubious reputation among his peers. He published
> several paperbacks on the "Transtheoretic Foundations
> of Mathematics", one of which discussed the Goldbach
> Conjecture in particular.
>
> Though it may appear otherwise, he was, in fact, a
> conventionally educated mathematician, receiving his
> Ph.D. from CUNY in 1969 under the advisor Raymond
> Smullyan. His dissertation was on "Goldbach Sentences
> in Some Abstract Arithmetics Constructed from a
> Generalization of Ordinary Recursive Arithmetic".
>
> ---
>
> note that it was NOT DISPROVED.

i meant that Pogorzelski's proof was not disproved , in other words it has not been proven that his proof contains a mistake ... ( for all clarity )

>
> and i am talking about a REAL MATHEMATICIAN
> PUBLISHING IN A REAL MATH MAGAZINE WITH PEER REVIEW ,
> YET WAS DISCRIMINATED AND IGNORED BY THE COMMUNITY
> !!!
>
> or are you going to compare pogorzelski to James
> Harris or musatov or some nut ?? plz ...
>
>
> tommy1729

tommy1729
 |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: The Fermat primes are factors of the denominators of the Bernoulli numbers 2^(n+1)
Next: Exterior Power Problem