hanning python
in [Python]
|
From: Pierre on 8 Sep 2009 07:36 Hello, anyone knows what is the python equivalent of the matlab's hanning function. Note that in matlab hann and hanning are different. Thanks !
From: pdpi on 8 Sep 2009 08:13 On Sep 8, 12:36 pm, Pierre <pierre.gaill...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Hello, > > anyone knows what is the python equivalent of the matlab's hanning > function. > > Note that in matlab hann and hanning are different. > > Thanks ! I assume you mean the tapering function mentioned here: http://mathworld.wolfram.com/HanningFunction.html Python is a general purpose language, unlike the maths-specialized MATLAB. I suggest you look into numpy, in which, a quick googling suggests, an implementation of a the Hanning function is provided. In fact, if you're using python to replace matlab in any meaningful way, you'll probably want to use numpy anyway.
From: sturlamolden on 8 Sep 2009 08:55 On 8 Sep, 13:36, Pierre <pierre.gaill...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > anyone knows what is the python equivalent of the matlab's hanning > function. > > Note that in matlab hann and hanning are different. If you don't know how to compute a von Hann window, you are not competent to do any scientific programming. Seriously! I assume you are using NumPy and SciPy, so consider scipy.signal.hanning for convinience.
From: pdpi on 8 Sep 2009 09:08 On Sep 8, 1:55 pm, sturlamolden <sturlamol...(a)yahoo.no> wrote: > On 8 Sep, 13:36, Pierre <pierre.gaill...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > anyone knows what is the python equivalent of the matlab's hanning > > function. > > > Note that in matlab hann and hanning are different. > > If you don't know how to compute a von Hann window, you are not > competent to do any scientific programming. Seriously! > Come, come. I think it's a good rule that, where available, a vendor- supplied implementation is the preferable choice until proven otherwise. > I assume you are using NumPy and SciPy, so consider > scipy.signal.hanning for convinience.
From: sturlamolden on 8 Sep 2009 14:12
On 8 Sep, 15:08, pdpi <pdpinhe...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > Come, come. I think it's a good rule that, where available, a vendor- > supplied implementation is the preferable choice until proven > otherwise. Even for the simplest of equations? |