From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax on 12 Jun 2010 12:52 On 12/06/2010 15:16, Winfield Hill wrote: > My Maxwell capacitors hard at work energy from harnessing lightning, see my post > with photo, at the CR4 forum. > > http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/55751/Lightning-Arrestor#comment579837 > > An illustration of how ugly numbers destroys a beautiful idea! -- Dirk http://www.transcendence.me.uk/ - Transcendence UK http://www.blogtalkradio.com/onetribe - Occult Talk Show
From: John Larkin on 12 Jun 2010 13:07 On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:45:11 -0700, BlindBaby <BlindMelonChitlin(a)wellnevergetthatonethealbumcover.org> wrote: >On 12 Jun 2010 08:33:45 -0700, Winfield Hill ><Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: > >>John Larkin wrote... >>> >>> Winfield Hill wrote: >>> >>>> My Maxwell capacitors hard at work energy from harnessing lightning, >>>> see my post with photo, at the CR4 forum. >>>> http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/55751/Lightning-Arrestor#comment579837 >>> >>> You rate 3 "good" answers out of 14. That site has very high >>> standards! >> >> Yes indeed! My lightning answer, complete with photo and >> calculations, is not yet a "good answer" because it didn't >> get enough votes. Hmm, it did get one vote, was that from >> you John? Thanks! >> >>> Why not use the lightning to heat water? The impedance match is >>> potentially better, and it's easy to store hot water. We could >>> throw a neighborhood hot-tub party after every strike, every >>> 40 years or so. >> >> Aren't there serious problems with developing a high electric >> field in water? I mean, above about 1V it wants to break apart >> into H2 and O. And what about the electrode double layers? >> >> I dunno, it'd need to be a tall 1MV / 100kA = 10-ohm resistor >> with water cooling, or something. But if rated at a puny 1MV, >> it wouldn't warm up much water, with only 1MJ of energy. Sigh. >> >>> We don't get lightning here. I kind of miss it. >> >> Yes. > > > If it can make it from way up there all the way down to way down here, >it can certainly make it across any dielectric inside any cap, so you >guys are poking holes in the insulator layers to beat the band, in your >caps.. > > A cap to store SOME lightning strike energy would be about a 300' x >300' (or more) insulator plate of Delrin or Teflon, or an even thinner >plate of GLASS. The storage plate would have to be completely >encapsulated. > > One ends up with a large, flat form factor Leyden jar. Do the math on that, please. John
From: Michael A. Terrell on 12 Jun 2010 13:06 John Larkin wrote: > > On 12 Jun 2010 07:16:54 -0700, Winfield Hill > <Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: > > >My Maxwell capacitors hard at work energy from harnessing lightning, see my post > >with photo, at the CR4 forum. > > > >http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/55751/Lightning-Arrestor#comment579837 > > You rate 3 "good" answers out of 14. That site has very high > standards! > > Why not use the lightning to heat water? The impedance match is > potentially better, and it's easy to store hot water. We could throw a > neighborhood hot-tub party after every strike, every 40 years or so. > > We don't get lightning here. I kind of miss it. Visit Central Florida in a month or so. We have storms with over 1000 strikes in a half hour. -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: John Larkin on 12 Jun 2010 13:16 On 12 Jun 2010 08:33:45 -0700, Winfield Hill <Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: >John Larkin wrote... >> >> Winfield Hill wrote: >> >>> My Maxwell capacitors hard at work energy from harnessing lightning, >>> see my post with photo, at the CR4 forum. >>> http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/55751/Lightning-Arrestor#comment579837 >> >> You rate 3 "good" answers out of 14. That site has very high >> standards! > > Yes indeed! My lightning answer, complete with photo and > calculations, is not yet a "good answer" because it didn't > get enough votes. Hmm, it did get one vote, was that from > you John? Thanks! No, sorry, I didn't register to vote. In fact, I don't register to vote on anything, ever. I don't want to decide anything about other peoples' lives. > >> Why not use the lightning to heat water? The impedance match is >> potentially better, and it's easy to store hot water. We could >> throw a neighborhood hot-tub party after every strike, every >> 40 years or so. > > Aren't there serious problems with developing a high electric > field in water? I mean, above about 1V it wants to break apart > into H2 and O. And what about the electrode double layers? I guess a little of the energy would go into dissolution. The fact is, a lightning pulse is so short, with such a risetime, it will be hard to steer into any load. > > I dunno, it'd need to be a tall 1MV / 100kA = 10-ohm resistor > with water cooling, or something. But if rated at a puny 1MV, > it wouldn't warm up much water, with only 1MJ of energy. Sigh. Yup. Lightning is all show. > >> We don't get lightning here. I kind of miss it. > > Yes. In New Orleans, you could sit on the Lake Pontchartrain levee and watch massive thunderstorm fronts sweep in, with beautiful and noisy lightning. It was usually warm rain and made warm puddles, so you could sit there and get wet and really experience things. Here we get pretty dramatic fog shows, some compensation. John
From: Archimedes' Lever on 12 Jun 2010 13:36
On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 10:07:37 -0700, John Larkin <jjlarkin(a)highNOTlandTHIStechnologyPART.com> wrote: >On Sat, 12 Jun 2010 08:45:11 -0700, BlindBaby ><BlindMelonChitlin(a)wellnevergetthatonethealbumcover.org> wrote: > >>On 12 Jun 2010 08:33:45 -0700, Winfield Hill >><Winfield_member(a)newsguy.com> wrote: >> >>>John Larkin wrote... >>>> >>>> Winfield Hill wrote: >>>> >>>>> My Maxwell capacitors hard at work energy from harnessing lightning, >>>>> see my post with photo, at the CR4 forum. >>>>> http://cr4.globalspec.com/thread/55751/Lightning-Arrestor#comment579837 >>>> >>>> You rate 3 "good" answers out of 14. That site has very high >>>> standards! >>> >>> Yes indeed! My lightning answer, complete with photo and >>> calculations, is not yet a "good answer" because it didn't >>> get enough votes. Hmm, it did get one vote, was that from >>> you John? Thanks! >>> >>>> Why not use the lightning to heat water? The impedance match is >>>> potentially better, and it's easy to store hot water. We could >>>> throw a neighborhood hot-tub party after every strike, every >>>> 40 years or so. >>> >>> Aren't there serious problems with developing a high electric >>> field in water? I mean, above about 1V it wants to break apart >>> into H2 and O. And what about the electrode double layers? >>> >>> I dunno, it'd need to be a tall 1MV / 100kA = 10-ohm resistor >>> with water cooling, or something. But if rated at a puny 1MV, >>> it wouldn't warm up much water, with only 1MJ of energy. Sigh. >>> >>>> We don't get lightning here. I kind of miss it. >>> >>> Yes. >> >> >> If it can make it from way up there all the way down to way down here, >>it can certainly make it across any dielectric inside any cap, so you >>guys are poking holes in the insulator layers to beat the band, in your >>caps.. >> >> A cap to store SOME lightning strike energy would be about a 300' x >>300' (or more) insulator plate of Delrin or Teflon, or an even thinner >>plate of GLASS. The storage plate would have to be completely >>encapsulated. >> >> One ends up with a large, flat form factor Leyden jar. > >Do the math on that, please. > >John Lightning: Smallest bolts are like 6MV. They drop down from a mile in the sky. They can surely make it across ANY two terminal device you think you can come up with. Unless you are separating the nodes by over a mile. My cap would flash over as well, but more would remain stored than in any of the scenarios discussed here thus far. No math required. |