Prev: fundamental representations
Next: Divisibility of polynomials of several variables
From: Archimedes Plutonium on 15 Jun 2010 15:37


Archimedes Plutonium wrote:
> Now I am wondering if there is a chemical element, say francium, or
> say a radioactive
> isotope that we can track if there was a single atom of that element?
> An element that
> is very easy to monitor and track if there was a singular atom of it
> in an experiment.
>
> I understand we can make diamonds with a high degree of purity. But I
> suspect that
> purity is not sufficient for a Dirac new radioactivities experiment,
> unless we can
> engineer that pure diamond with a counted number of radioactive atoms,
> say ten
> atoms of uranium fitted inside a highly pure diamond.
>
> But better yet, I am thinking of a radioactive isotope that is easy to
> monitor if we
> had just a single atom of it. And hopefully it is a carbon isotope, or
> perhaps a
> gold isotope or silver isotope or a platinum isotope. Because in our
> history we
> have made coins and jewelry out of these metals and of course diamond
> jewelry.
>
> So the question for the experiment is if there is a isotope that is
> easy to
> monitor for a single atom of that isotope. Then in the experiment,
> measure
> for the prescence of that isotope.
> ato
> If gold has a isotope that is easy to measure then we can enlist the
> gold
> bars or coins minted of old age.
>
> If not, then we go with the straightforward experiment. We find what
> atom is
> easiest to monitor. We then chose a atomic number lower from the
> monitoring
> atom. For example if plutonium atom is the easiest to monitor then we
> chose
> uranium or neptunium atoms as the base of the experiment. We then
> enlist
> the help of the scanning tunnel microscope that can count out the base
> atoms.
> Suppose we count out 100 of these base atoms, say for example
> neptunium
> atoms. So we isolate those 100 atoms and we watch them over a period
> of time.
> On a day in which we come to look at our 100 atoms and find that there
> are only
> 99 neptunium atoms and 1 plutonium atom, is the day we have proven
> Dirac's
> new radioactivities additive creation is true. Is our state of
> technology and engineering
> up to par for such an experiment? I believe so.
>

There probably already have been experiments that have witnessed the
odd higher
atomic element or isotope appear, and then counted it as a glitch in
their experiment
not thinking any further upon it.

But I do recall that the comets water content is very much different
from that of the
heavy water found in comets versus Earth's oceans. To me this is a
fine example of
Dirac's new radioactivities, that the comets have undergone a
different new-radioactivities
from that of the Earth's ocean water. So I beleive we already have the
experiment performed
and only have to interpret correctly the Dirac new radioactivity of
additive creation upon
the Comet water versus the Earth ocean water. So here is a case where
the experiment
was already performed, or we can repeat it here on Earth. And that we
only need to
marshall the correct sequence of events as to how the heavy water got
into the Comets.

Archimedes Plutonium
http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: fundamental representations
Next: Divisibility of polynomials of several variables