Prev: Eorror in move mailbox from Exchnage 2003 to Exchnage 2010
Next: 07 sp2 needs to extend schema?
From: Pearl on 17 May 2010 10:16 we have 3 Exchange 2003 mailbox servers that house our mailboxes. Exch1 and Exch2 house the majority of our mailboxes. On these two servers, I am seeing a high instance continually of DiskQueue and Pages/sec values while not so on Exch3. As an added note, we also have BES enterprise and Enterprise Vault in our environment. I only mention those because they interface with the mailboxes but my gut tells me that the problem is more related to the number of mailboxes on Exch1 and Exch2....Anyway, I'm new to troubleshooting Exchange so I'm looking for experienced direction as to where I should proceed. thnks.
From: Ed Crowley [MVP] on 20 May 2010 23:17 You're on the right track, except that BES may well be a huge part of the issue since for Exchange 2003 one BES user causes the load of about 5 regular users. The configuration of the disk subsystem also plays an important part. -- Ed Crowley MVP "There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems." .. "Pearl" <Pearl(a)discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:4EA16B7C-C30C-4B61-86D7-6B037AAFF1F8(a)microsoft.com... > we have 3 Exchange 2003 mailbox servers that house our mailboxes. Exch1 > and > Exch2 house the majority of our mailboxes. On these two servers, I am > seeing > a high instance continually of DiskQueue and Pages/sec values while not so > on > Exch3. As an added note, we also have BES enterprise and Enterprise > Vault > in our environment. I only mention those because they interface with the > mailboxes but my gut tells me that the problem is more related to the > number > of mailboxes on Exch1 and Exch2....Anyway, I'm new to troubleshooting > Exchange so I'm looking for experienced direction as to where I should > proceed. thnks.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: Eorror in move mailbox from Exchnage 2003 to Exchnage 2010 Next: 07 sp2 needs to extend schema? |