From: us on
Walter Roberson <roberson(a)hushmail.com> wrote in message <JpaLn.17955$h57.156(a)newsfe22.iad>...
> Artur Racu wrote:
>
> > it is ok...but you know then the chief want that the mean to be zero it
> > is very hard to convience him that this answer is good
>
> So subtract off the mean that you do get, and the result will be have a
> mean of 0 (to within round-off error.)

walter the magician...
that's exactly IT...

us
From: Artur Artur on
Ken <ken.colwell(a)gmail.com> wrote in message <cbca5506-8ca7-4458-8454-8e305aac654a(a)r9g2000vbk.googlegroups.com>...
> > In theory, the mean of a set of numbers generated using RANDN will be 0.
> > In practice, it won't.
> > Here's a smaller example that may convince your chief that expecting exactly
> > the theoretical result in practice is not always a good idea.
> >
> > Take a six-sided die and roll it once.  The mean value of the "sequence" of
> > numbers generated by that roll is whatever number came up on the die -- but
> > the theoretical mean is 3.5.  That's not achievable with one roll of that
> > standard die.  Even if you choose to roll that die a large odd number of
> > times, you will never be able to achieve the theoretical mean of that number
> > of rolls as all the numbers on the die are integers.
> >
> > If that argument doesn't work, then point him to Wikipedia (particularly the
> > second example on this page):
> >
> > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_averages
> >
> > If nothing else that should occupy him for a few hours following links to
> > interesting topics :)
> >
> > --
> > Steve Lord
> > sl...(a)mathworks.com
> > comp.soft-sys.matlab (CSSM) FAQ:http://matlabwiki.mathworks.com/MATLAB_FAQ
> > To contact Technical Support use the Contact Us link onhttp://www.mathworks.com
>
>
> hey,
>
> just to have fun being technical:
>
> in theory, the mean of a set of numbers generated using randn *is a
> random variable with a distribution centered at zero*, whose standard
> deviation tightens as you increase the size of the set. in the limit
> of infinite numbers in the set, the probability density function
> becomes a delta function at zero (probability 1).
>
> wouldn't be worth mentioning except you're implying a difference
> between theory and practice that doesn't exist. actually, in theory,
> you will NEVER get exactly zero with a finite set of numbers (because
> you're integrating the probability density function "from zero to
> zero").
>
> artur: the true statement would be "for white noise, the EXPECTED mean
> is zero." also, if I'm understanding you right re: "gaussian curve
> values", use normpdf() or mvnpdf().

ok merci for this...but finaly how can i generate a white gaussian noise in matlab version 2009, becouse in this version i don't have the function WGN or AWGN
thnak you,
Artur
From: Bruno Luong on
... If mean(randn(10,1)) is 0 (as Artur's boss claim),
then mean(randn(9,1)) should also be 0 (why not),
etc, ...
...
mean(randn(2,1)) is also 0
mean(randn(1,1)) is also 0, therefore randn(1,1) would be 0 (I hope you still follow).

Conclusion any Gaussian random process is a 0-delta function. Statistics would be easy like a toy game. Any noise vanishes, all measurement are infinity accurate, good does not play dice, the world will be perfect, and the peace is for all.

I say no one can fire Artur's boss.

Bruno
From: Artur Artur on
TideMan <mulgor(a)gmail.com> wrote in message <d34de8f8-c5f2-4b8c-ba8f-0e03707ab1a9(a)s1g2000prf.googlegroups.com>...
> I think I've come up with the perfect sop for Artur's boss who doesn't
> like the mean of 10 random numbers not being exactly zero.
> round(mean(randn(10,1)))

for me this are just truckies(becouse it doesn't met the white noise definition)
From: Artur Artur on
"Bruno Luong" <b.luong(a)fogale.findmycountry> wrote in message <htk4bs$ivo$1(a)fred.mathworks.com>...
> .. If mean(randn(10,1)) is 0 (as Artur's boss claim),
> then mean(randn(9,1)) should also be 0 (why not),
> etc, ...
> ..
> mean(randn(2,1)) is also 0
> mean(randn(1,1)) is also 0, therefore randn(1,1) would be 0 (I hope you still follow).
>
> Conclusion any Gaussian random process is a 0-delta function. Statistics would be easy like a toy game. Any noise vanishes, all measurement are infinity accurate, good does not play dice, the world will be perfect, and the peace is for all.
>
> I say no one can fire Artur's boss.
>
> Bruno


nice nice Bruno :)