From: Hugo Vanwoerkom on
Stephen Powell wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Apr 2010 11:41:43 -0400 (EDT), Hugo Vanwoerkom wrote:
>> How come the latest linux-image-2.6-686 in Sid is:
>>
>> http://packages.debian.org/sid/linux-headers-2.6-686
>>
>> and is set to linux-image-2.6-686 (2.6.32+24) while apt-cache policy
>> linux-image-2.6-686 gives:
>>
>> linux-image-2.6-686:
>> Installed: 2.6.32+25
>> Candidate: 2.6.32+25
>> Version table:
>> *** 2.6.32+25 0
>> 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main Packages
>> 100 /var/lib/dpkg/status
>>
>> while linux-image-2.6.32-4-686 (2.6.32-11) is the latest per:
>>
>> apt-cache policy linux-image-2.6.32-4-686
>> linux-image-2.6.32-4-686:
>> Installed: (none)
>> Candidate: 2.6.32-11
>> Version table:
>> 2.6.32-11 0
>> 500 http://ftp.de.debian.org unstable/main Packages
>
> I do not know the answer to your question, but dare I suggest that
> in the future you put a little more forethought into choosing the
> subject line of your post? Think about someone else who may have
> a similar question to yours. They are searching the internet with
> a search engine. What are the chances of this thread seeming
> relevant to them with a title like "how come..."?
>

Sorry.

Hugo




--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/hpo17a$303$1(a)dough.gmane.org