From: Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn on
Garrett Smith wrote:

> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Garrett Smith wrote:
>>> | You're attemtping to use XMLHttpRequest for something it was not
>>> | designed for. XMLHttpRequest is in Working Draft status, and is
>>> | specified therein for http and https only[1].
>>>
>>> I stand by that entirely.
>>>
>>> That paragraph does not mention MSXML;
>> It is referring explicitly to XMLHttpRequest behavior in "IE", though.
>
> No, it is not.

Yes, it is, see below.

>>> MSXML is unrelated to XMLHttpRequest,
>>
>> No, it is not. But more important is that "IE" is not unrelated to
>> "XMLHttpRequest", by your own account.
>>
>>> and unrelated to what is noticed about XMLHttpRequest, which is linked
>>> in the footnote[1]:-
>>>
>>> | [1]<http://www.w3.org/TR/XMLHttpRequest/#introduction>
>>
>> Once more, for the intellectually challenged: By saying that someone who
>> uses XMLHttpRequest in "IE" "attempted to use XMLHttpRequest for
>> something it was not designed for", when that something was local file
>> access via `file', and then stating that "XMLHttpRequest [...] is
>> specified [in the Working Draft [...] for `http' or `https' only" is
>> undoubtedly justifying the (way the) implementation (in "IE" works) with
>> the draft.
>
> You're making this up.

No, your reply (which full context you deliberately omitted) included:

| foka wrote:
| > Hi.I have got a problem with javascript and XML.
| > I want to put data from XML file to HTML <select> options.
| > My code is working but only if I put this (websites) on server, but I
| > want to run my html site on every comp, localy, for example from CD.,
| > on windows without Apache etc.
| > When I run my site localy file:///C:/file.html then my <select> is
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| > empty.
^^^^^^
| >
| > My Ajax code:
|
| As you have noticed, some browsers support file protocol with
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| XMLHttpRequest and IE doesn't. The ActiveXObject constructor does
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| support that.
|
| You're attemtping to use XMLHttpRequest for something it was not
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| designed for. XMLHttpRequest is in Working Draft status, and is
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| specified therein for http and https only[1].
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

I have marked the important parts. Do you deny that you wrote this? Do you
deny that the second paragraph of your answer is referring to the first,
which is referring exactly to the OP's problem in IE (or rather your
assumption thereof because of the problems observed)? Do you still deny
that you are justifying the way the implementation in "IE" works (or rather
not works) with what a/the Working Draft has to say about this?


PointedEars
--
realism: HTML 4.01 Strict
evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
-- Bjoern Hoehrmann
First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
Prev: Quicktime and innerHTML
Next: option & textnode