From: Vadkan Jozsef on 27 Jan 2010 01:20 sorry:D i wanted to write: it's not working. :\ On k, 2010-01-26 at 19:42 -0500, Stephen Powell wrote: > On 2010-01-01 at 19:04:22 -0500, Vadkan Jozsef wrote: > > i wrote this two lines: > > > > * hard nofile 10240 > > * soft nofile 10240 > > > > in /etc/security/limits.conf, reboot > > but its now working. > > That does not make sense. Do you mean "and it's now working", > or do you mean "but it's not working"? > > The asterisk does start in column 1 of the file, right? > And there's no pound sign (#) in front of it, right? > The lines which start with a pound sign are comments. > The default version of this file is either blank lines > or comments; there are no effective lines in it. > > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
From: Alex Samad on 27 Jan 2010 03:50 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:15:19AM +0100, Vadkan Jozsef wrote: > sorry:D > > i wanted to write: it's not working. :\ what happens when you type ulimit -a plus you need # Sets up user limits according to /etc/security/limits.conf # (Replaces the use of /etc/limits in old login) session required pam_limits.so in your /etc/pam.d/login file > > > On k, 2010-01-26 at 19:42 -0500, Stephen Powell wrote: > > On 2010-01-01 at 19:04:22 -0500, Vadkan Jozsef wrote: > > > i wrote this two lines: > > > > > > * hard nofile 10240 > > > * soft nofile 10240 > > > > > > in /etc/security/limits.conf, reboot > > > but its now working. > > > > That does not make sense. Do you mean "and it's now working", [snip] > > or do you mean "but it's not working"?
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: Wireless Mouse vs. Cell Phone ?? (Found source?) Next: hangs with 2.6.32 on debian squeeze? |