From: Vadkan Jozsef on
sorry:D

i wanted to write: it's not working. :\


On k, 2010-01-26 at 19:42 -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
> On 2010-01-01 at 19:04:22 -0500, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
> > i wrote this two lines:
> >
> > * hard nofile 10240
> > * soft nofile 10240
> >
> > in /etc/security/limits.conf, reboot
> > but its now working.
>
> That does not make sense. Do you mean "and it's now working",
> or do you mean "but it's not working"?
>
> The asterisk does start in column 1 of the file, right?
> And there's no pound sign (#) in front of it, right?
> The lines which start with a pound sign are comments.
> The default version of this file is either blank lines
> or comments; there are no effective lines in it.
>
>



--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-REQUEST(a)lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster(a)lists.debian.org
From: Alex Samad on
On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 07:15:19AM +0100, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
> sorry:D
>
> i wanted to write: it's not working. :\


what happens when you type ulimit -a


plus you need

# Sets up user limits according to /etc/security/limits.conf
# (Replaces the use of /etc/limits in old login)
session required pam_limits.so

in your /etc/pam.d/login file


>
>
> On k, 2010-01-26 at 19:42 -0500, Stephen Powell wrote:
> > On 2010-01-01 at 19:04:22 -0500, Vadkan Jozsef wrote:
> > > i wrote this two lines:
> > >
> > > * hard nofile 10240
> > > * soft nofile 10240
> > >
> > > in /etc/security/limits.conf, reboot
> > > but its now working.
> >
> > That does not make sense. Do you mean "and it's now working",

[snip]

> > or do you mean "but it's not working"?