Prev: Can't delete temporary roaming profile on a terminal server.
Next: Upgrading Server 2008 core to 2008 R2 core?
From: John John - MVP on 16 Apr 2010 13:27 You should not place the pagefile on a fault tolerant drive, such as RAID-5. Typically writing to fault tolerant drives is slower because of multiple writes to the disks. John Chris wrote: > I might try. With RAID 5 with 5 disks what value will be consider high disk > I/O for following perfmon counters: > > avg. disk queue length and current disk queue length > > Some articles said 1.5 -2 x spindles but some said total spindles +2. Can > you advice? > > Thanks. > > "Andrew Morton" wrote: > >> Chris wrote: >>> We have a Dell PE 2950 with 32 GB RAM, running w2k8 sp2. It has 5 >>> SAS disks and is set as a single RAID 5, with two volumes C and D. >>> C: is for OS and D: is for data. The server is used for flat file >>> server but with heavy export and import one in the morning and one in >>> the afternoon for a couple hours. Whenever this happens the server >>> became very slow, almost non-responding. Those export and import to >>> set to use D:. We have set 33 GB page file on C:. It improved but >>> not much. Still have "lockup". Since the heavy load is on logical >>> volume D: I'm wondering: >>> >>> 1. will it be helpful if I set another page file on D:? Because C: >>> and D: are on the same RAID will it make any difference? >>> >>> 2. If it helps what size will be a good start? D: is at 2 TB. >>> >> If you are sure it is the paging which is slowing it down, could you add a >> separate physical disk drive dedicated to the paging file? >> >> "Optimizing Your Servers' Pagefile Performance": >> http://oreilly.com/pub/a/windows/2004/04/27/pagefile.html >> Notice especially the section "Keeping the Pagefile Separate." >> >> -- >> Andrew >> >> >> . >>
From: DaveMills on 19 Apr 2010 02:17 On Thu, 15 Apr 2010 10:43:02 +0100, "Andrew Morton" <akm(a)in-press.co.uk.invalid> wrote: >Chris wrote: >> We have a Dell PE 2950 with 32 GB RAM, running w2k8 sp2. It has 5 >> SAS disks and is set as a single RAID 5, with two volumes C and D. >> C: is for OS and D: is for data. The server is used for flat file >> server but with heavy export and import one in the morning and one in >> the afternoon for a couple hours. Whenever this happens the server >> became very slow, almost non-responding. Those export and import to >> set to use D:. We have set 33 GB page file on C:. It improved but >> not much. Still have "lockup". Since the heavy load is on logical >> volume D: I'm wondering: >> >> 1. will it be helpful if I set another page file on D:? Because C: >> and D: are on the same RAID will it make any difference? >> >> 2. If it helps what size will be a good start? D: is at 2 TB. >> > >If you are sure it is the paging which is slowing it down, could you add a >separate physical disk drive dedicated to the paging file? This would be a good place to use one of the solid state disks. The page file is only temporary storage and the higher performance would be useful. > >"Optimizing Your Servers' Pagefile Performance": >http://oreilly.com/pub/a/windows/2004/04/27/pagefile.html >Notice especially the section "Keeping the Pagefile Separate." -- Dave Mills There are 10 types of people, those that understand binary and those that don't.
From: Mervyn Zhang [MSFT] on 2 May 2010 23:01
Hello, The managed support service of the newsgroup Windows Server General is now available instead on: Windows Server http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/category/windowsserver Would you please repost the question in the forum with the Windows Live ID used to access your Subscription benefits? Our engineers will assist you in the new platform. In the future, please post Windows Server related questions directly to the forums. If you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact us: tngfb(a)microsoft.com. Regards, Mervyn Zhang Microsoft Online Community Support ================================================== This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights. |