http bug
in [Java Programming]
|
From: Roedy Green on 21 Jan 2010 08:15 On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:21:59 -0500, Arne Vajh�j <arne(a)vajhoej.dk> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >Sounds more like a very slow DNS server and your immediate DNS server >having the name cached the second time. Should not the GET timeout if the DNS server takes 4 minutes? -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com Responsible Development is the style of development I aspire to now. It can be summarized by answering the question, �How would I develop if it were my money?� I�m amazed how many theoretical arguments evaporate when faced with this question. ~ Kent Beck (born: 1961 age: 49) , evangelist for extreme programming .
From: Lew on 21 Jan 2010 10:19 Arne Vajhøj wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >> Given that the code was explicit stated to be Apache, then >> complaining to SUN would not make much sense. Roedy Green wrote: > He was not explicit. If you know that GetMethod and PostMethod are > unique to Apache, you could infer that. But Lothar did not state it > explicitly. The audience is wider than those who post. It always > helps to make things abundantly clear. Lothar wasn't explicit, but Arne didn't say it was Lothar. Daniel was explicit, in the post to which Lothar responded. -- Lew
From: Lothar Kimmeringer on 21 Jan 2010 12:04 Roedy Green wrote: > On Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:23:35 -0500, Arne Vajh�j <arne(a)vajhoej.dk> > wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : > >>Given that the code was explicit stated to be Apache, then >>complaining to SUN would not make much sense. > > He was not explicit. If you know that GetMethod and PostMethod are > unique to Apache, you could infer that. Reading the quoted text of a post often helps. I was answering to | I often find the standard HttpUrlConnection lacking, and usually go with | apache commons HttpClient instead. > But Lothar did not state it > explicitly. The audience is wider than those who post. It always > helps to make things abundantly clear. I'm quite sure that most of the lurkers were also able to tell, what framework I was ranting about. ;-) Regards, Lothar -- Lothar Kimmeringer E-Mail: spamfang(a)kimmeringer.de PGP-encrypted mails preferred (Key-ID: 0x8BC3CD81) Always remember: The answer is forty-two, there can only be wrong questions!
From: Lothar Kimmeringer on 21 Jan 2010 12:16 Arne Vajh�j wrote: > On 20-01-2010 14:53, Lothar Kimmeringer wrote: > >> The last time I checked, GetMethod and PostMethod were two >> classes sharing a lot of methods but not a common superclass. > > Sure? > > HttpClient 2.0.2 has a common super class. As I said: "The last time I checked" It's been quite a while now, deciding to use HttpUrlConnection instead for implementing my AS2-Connector. The code I posted was taken from another application developed by a coworker. Since my decision I never came back to the point of reconsideration because all the features of HttpClient I in general don't need. Regards, Lothar -- Lothar Kimmeringer E-Mail: spamfang(a)kimmeringer.de PGP-encrypted mails preferred (Key-ID: 0x8BC3CD81) Always remember: The answer is forty-two, there can only be wrong questions!
From: Lew on 21 Jan 2010 16:41
On Jan 21, 12:16 pm, > Lothar Kimmeringer wrote: >>> The last time I checked, GetMethod and PostMethod were two >>> classes sharing a lot of methods but not a common superclass. Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> Sure? > >> HttpClient 2.0.2 has a common super class. > Lothar Kimmeringer wrote: > As I said: "The last time I checked" It's been quite a while now, > Really must have been quite a while, given that the April 25, 2001, revision of 'GetMethod', marked "initial revision", and the same-date version of 'PostMethod', also marked "initial revision", both inherit from 'HttpMethodBase'; in fact, that version of 'PostMethod' directly inherits from 'GetMethod'. Given that "HttpClient was started in 2001 as a subproject of the Jakarta Commons," <http://hc.apache.org/httpclient-3.x/index.html> I don't think you could have been using it much earlier than that. -- Lew |