Prev: recommendation for free Exchange 2003 reporting tool
Next: Exchange 2010 edge server and 2007 HT server
From: Markus Weber on 23 Jan 2010 04:05 I've tested it now with Exchange 2007 SP1/Office 2007 and there it seems to be ok. But no luck yet with Exchange 2010 ... Anyone successfully used Import-Mailbox on Exchange 2010 with external addresses in To:/Cc: fields not getting messed up? TBC. Markus "Markus Weber" wrote in message news:hid6hp$62p$1(a)nread-ng.de.kpn-eurorings.net... > > Just to add: This also happens to emails in PSTs generated > with Export-Mailbox on the same server and then re-imported > with Import-Mailbox, while reading the same PST with Outlook > 2010 beta or other versions show the emails as they should. > > Anyone else seen this? Or can someone say, it's working for > him? > > Thanks, Markus > > "Markus Weber" wrote in message > news:hi7vjp$1gv$1(a)nread-ng.de.kpn-eurorings.net... >> Hi everyone, >> >> did anyone ever came across the problem, that addresses in the >> To:/Cc: field of external addresses showing up as >> >> =SMTP:user(a)domain.TLD >> >> after a pst has been imported with Import-Mailbox on Exchange >> 2010? >> >> Effect would be, that users would not be able to reply on these >> addresses (reply all). The From: address is ok. >> >> Opening the pst directly with the client does not expose this >> problem, but that's not a real migration option ... >> >> Lab environment is based on Windows Srv Std 2008R2, Trail version >> of Exchange 2010 (Build 639.21), on the import host Outlook 2010 >> x64 Beta (Pro Plus, only Outlook installed, 14.0.4536.1000) is used >> and the client is on Win7 Pro 32bit/Outlook 2007 or/and OWA of the >> Exchange server itself. >> >> Any idea? Many thanks, Markus >> >> >> Background: We prepare a inter forest migration from a W2K domain >> with Exchange Server 2003 SP2 to W2K8R2 and Exchange 2010. No in- >> tention to use ADMT , "same" accounts will be manually entered in >> the new domain and X500 addresses added so replies to "internal" >> users will work. >> Not sure if New-MoveRequest would be an option at all (I think I >> remember having read somewhere, that it would require a 2K3 DC in >> the source domain) - it looks like it's doing a bit too much ... >> I only need the content copied in the target org, sometimes to a >> different user name, no perms/attrs migrated at all ... >> > >
First
|
Prev
|
Pages: 1 2 Prev: recommendation for free Exchange 2003 reporting tool Next: Exchange 2010 edge server and 2007 HT server |