From: Serge E. Hallyn on
Quoting Amerigo Wang (amwang(a)redhat.com):
> It looks weird that we have HARD_MSGMAX lower on 64bit than on 32bit,
> since usually 64bit machines have more memory than 32bit machines.

It does look like this may have been an accident.

> Making it higher on 64bit seems reasonable, and keep the original
> number on 32bit.
>
> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serue(a)us.ibm.com>
> Cc: Cedric Le Goater <clg(a)fr.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang(a)redhat.com>
>
> ---
> diff --git a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> index e408722..07baa38 100644
> --- a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> +++ b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ extern int mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns);
> /* default values */
> #define DFLT_QUEUESMAX 256 /* max number of message queues */
> #define DFLT_MSGMAX 10 /* max number of messages in each queue */
> -#define HARD_MSGMAX (131072/sizeof(void *))
> +#define HARD_MSGMAX (32768*sizeof(void *)/4)

why /4 ? You're now making it much smaller for 32-bit than it
used to be?

> #define DFLT_MSGSIZEMAX 8192 /* max message size */
> #else
> static inline int mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns) { return 0; }
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Américo Wang on

(Hi, I am the same person.)

On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 08:44:33AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
>Quoting Amerigo Wang (amwang(a)redhat.com):
>> It looks weird that we have HARD_MSGMAX lower on 64bit than on 32bit,
>> since usually 64bit machines have more memory than 32bit machines.
>
>It does look like this may have been an accident.
>

OK.

>> Making it higher on 64bit seems reasonable, and keep the original
>> number on 32bit.
>>
>> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serue(a)us.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Cedric Le Goater <clg(a)fr.ibm.com>
>> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang(a)redhat.com>
>>
>> ---
>> diff --git a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
>> index e408722..07baa38 100644
>> --- a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
>> +++ b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
>> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ extern int mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns);
>> /* default values */
>> #define DFLT_QUEUESMAX 256 /* max number of message queues */
>> #define DFLT_MSGMAX 10 /* max number of messages in each queue */
>> -#define HARD_MSGMAX (131072/sizeof(void *))
>> +#define HARD_MSGMAX (32768*sizeof(void *)/4)
>
>why /4 ? You're now making it much smaller for 32-bit than it
>used to be?
>

Yes?

Before this patch, it is 131072/sizeof(void*) = 32768;
after this patch, it is 32768*sizeof(void*)/4 = 32768 too.
Both on 32bit, of course.

Am I missing something?


--
Live like a child, think like the god.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Serge E. Hallyn on
Quoting Am�rico Wang (xiyou.wangcong(a)gmail.com):
>
> (Hi, I am the same person.)
>
> On Fri, Dec 11, 2009 at 08:44:33AM -0600, Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> >Quoting Amerigo Wang (amwang(a)redhat.com):
> >> It looks weird that we have HARD_MSGMAX lower on 64bit than on 32bit,
> >> since usually 64bit machines have more memory than 32bit machines.
> >
> >It does look like this may have been an accident.
> >
>
> OK.
>
> >> Making it higher on 64bit seems reasonable, and keep the original
> >> number on 32bit.
> >>
> >> Cc: Serge E. Hallyn <serue(a)us.ibm.com>
> >> Cc: Cedric Le Goater <clg(a)fr.ibm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: WANG Cong <amwang(a)redhat.com>
> >>
> >> ---
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> >> index e408722..07baa38 100644
> >> --- a/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> >> +++ b/include/linux/ipc_namespace.h
> >> @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ extern int mq_init_ns(struct ipc_namespace *ns);
> >> /* default values */
> >> #define DFLT_QUEUESMAX 256 /* max number of message queues */
> >> #define DFLT_MSGMAX 10 /* max number of messages in each queue */
> >> -#define HARD_MSGMAX (131072/sizeof(void *))
> >> +#define HARD_MSGMAX (32768*sizeof(void *)/4)
> >
> >why /4 ? You're now making it much smaller for 32-bit than it
> >used to be?
> >
>
> Yes?
>
> Before this patch, it is 131072/sizeof(void*) = 32768;
> after this patch, it is 32768*sizeof(void*)/4 = 32768 too.
> Both on 32bit, of course.
>
> Am I missing something?

Haha, nope.

Acked-by: Serge Hallyn <serue(a)us.ibm.com>

thanks,
-serge
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/