From: David Mark on 20 Jan 2010 12:54 On Jan 20, 12:47 pm, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 20, 9:58 am, David Mark <dmark.cins...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Jan 18, 3:39 pm, Scott Sauyet <scott.sau...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > >> That doesn't indicate anything wrong with the library any more than > >> any lint program indicates problems with its target environment. > > > Of course, you don't need a lint to see what is wrong with the > > library. > > As said, the post was definitely flamebait! :-) Yes, truth in labeling here. > > > It's as obviously unsuitable as a dissertation written in crayon. > > :-) > > I met someone who did that. Literally. Or so she claimed. Of course > her paper was on how to creatively integrate art education into pre- > school and Kindergarten programs. It was filled with many colorful > illustrations. Her adviser loved it, and so did most of the > committee. But she did eventually have to submit a more formal > version. So much for creativity! > It has its place. |