From: Garrett Smith on
On 2010-07-15 11:27 AM, Dr J R Stockton wrote:
> In comp.lang.javascript message<i1itco$so4$1(a)news.eternal-
> september.org>, Tue, 13 Jul 2010 16:38:05, Garrett Smith
> <dhtmlkitchen(a)gmail.com> posted:
>
>> On 2010-07-08 11:21 AM, Dr J R Stockton wrote:
>
>>> The Notes are not posted here for review, and should not be considered
>>> as being part of the collective FAQ.
>>>
>>> The FAQ proper should include, not just link to, the content of
>>> <http://www.jibbering.com/faq/notes/>.
>>>
>> I agree that including notes in daily postings is a good idea. I do not
>> agree that they should be inline in the HTML version of the FAQ.
>
> My "the content of<http://www.jibbering.com/faq/notes/>" above means
> the content of that page. It does not mean any more than that; it does
> not mean the whole set of notes.
>

Got it.

> It comprises a mere 19 lines as displayed; ignoring head, tail, comment,
> and blank lines, just 52 lines of loosely-formatted source; 1637
> characters, or 1165 without leading spaces. That's not a lot.
>
Each one of those notes articles is linked from a relevant FAQ Entry.
--
Garrett