Prev: lush
Next: blas, sgemm, cffi
From: His kennyness on 9 Apr 2010 11:36
Now here: http://github.com/kennytilton/cells
Requires: http://github.com/kennytilton/utils-kt

Status: cells::test-cells passes under AllegroCL 8.2 on (yes!) Linux and
most likely Windows since I am actually installing from the latest
there. In fact, once I get into the GUI stuff (er, next) I really will
be claiming only Windows compatibility.

Patches welcome to increase portability.

Caveat: kenny does not use ASDF, so .asd files are not maintained. Look
at .lpr files for The Real Deal.

Next steps: gui-geometry, celtk (+ cells Tcl/Tk)

Not clear yet if I want to charge thru everything up to and including
Cello or cut over to qooxdoo/cells. I think I'll see how this goes
(getting celtk and then celtk-3d) up and portable and then decide.

From: His kennyness on 9 Apr 2010 11:43
His kennyness wrote:
> Now here: http://github.com/kennytilton/cells
> Requires: http://github.com/kennytilton/utils-kt
>
> Status: cells::test-cells passes under AllegroCL 8.2 on (yes!) Linux and
> most likely Windows since I am actually installing from the latest
> there. In fact, once I get into the GUI stuff (er, next) I really will
> be claiming only Windows compatibility.
>
> Patches welcome to increase portability.
>
> Caveat: kenny does not use ASDF, so .asd files are not maintained. Look
> at .lpr files for The Real Deal.
>
> Next steps: gui-geometry, celtk (+ cells Tcl/Tk)
>
> Not clear yet if I want to charge thru everything up to and including
> Cello or cut over to qooxdoo/cells.

An interesting thing here is that celtk will very much be the model for
qxells (I am looking for an unpronouncable name) because it's the same
deal: Lisp+Cells driving a fullblown application framework with a mind
of its own.

Anyone who thinks we should just do jxells (+ Cells Ajax) meaning
fighting browser differences might be able to convince me since I like
the idea of lightweight and I do not like the idea of widgets. And as
for browser differences, qooxdoo /does/ expose it's low-level core so...

kenny




I think I'll see how this goes
> (getting celtk and then celtk-3d) up and portable and then decide.
>
From: D Herring on 10 Apr 2010 00:04
On 04/09/2010 11:36 AM, His kennyness wrote:
> Now here: http://github.com/kennytilton/cells
> Requires: http://github.com/kennytilton/utils-kt

Congratulations on the repository move.

FWIW, common-lisp.net does have git support.

Would you like to export all the CVS history to git?

- Daniel
From: His kennyness on 10 Apr 2010 00:40
D Herring wrote:
> On 04/09/2010 11:36 AM, His kennyness wrote:
>> Now here: http://github.com/kennytilton/cells
>> Requires: http://github.com/kennytilton/utils-kt
>
> Congratulations on the repository move.
>
> FWIW, common-lisp.net does have git support.

:)

I asked and was encouraged to move to github for the SCM but carry on
with c-l.net for the web site. I added "and mailing list" on my own.


>
> Would you like to export all the CVS history to git?

As my Mom could tell you, I am a lousy buddhist but one thing I am good
at is not acknowledging the past.

Thx, tho!

kt

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: lush
Next: blas, sgemm, cffi