From: divya on
Hi,

Today kernel(version 2.6.35-git10 -commitid 3d30701b58970) build fails with following error on both system x and p

fs/9p/vfs_inode.c: In function 'v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl':
fs/9p/vfs_inode.c:1267: error: implicit declaration of function 'inode_setattr'
make[2]: *** [fs/9p/vfs_inode.o] Error 1
make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[1]: *** [fs/9p] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make: *** [fs] Error 2
make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....

Seems like the commit 87d7845aa0b is the corrupt which added the function v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl()

Thanks
Divya


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Stephen Rothwell on
Hi Divya,

On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:51:35 +0530 divya <dipraksh(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Today kernel(version 2.6.35-git10 -commitid 3d30701b58970) build fails with following error on both system x and p
>
> fs/9p/vfs_inode.c: In function 'v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl':
> fs/9p/vfs_inode.c:1267: error: implicit declaration of function 'inode_setattr'

This is known about and a fix is pending. Thanks.

--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
From: Sripathi Kodi on
On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:51:35 +0530
divya <dipraksh(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Today kernel(version 2.6.35-git10 -commitid 3d30701b58970) build fails with following error on both system x and p
>
> fs/9p/vfs_inode.c: In function 'v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl':
> fs/9p/vfs_inode.c:1267: error: implicit declaration of function 'inode_setattr'
> make[2]: *** [fs/9p/vfs_inode.o] Error 1
> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make[1]: *** [fs/9p] Error 2
> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
> make: *** [fs] Error 2
> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>
> Seems like the commit 87d7845aa0b is the corrupt which added the function v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl()

Yes, it is a problem I created. Stephen Rothwell has already fixed it.
Al Viro has sent a git pull request to Linus today with the fix in it.
Here is the patch you need: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/21/442

Thanks,
Sripathi.

>
> Thanks
> Divya
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Piotr Hosowicz on
On 11.08.2010 09:53, Sripathi Kodi wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:51:35 +0530
> divya<dipraksh(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Today kernel(version 2.6.35-git10 -commitid 3d30701b58970) build fails with following error on both system x and p
>>
>> fs/9p/vfs_inode.c: In function 'v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl':
>> fs/9p/vfs_inode.c:1267: error: implicit declaration of function 'inode_setattr'
>> make[2]: *** [fs/9p/vfs_inode.o] Error 1
>> make[2]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> make[1]: *** [fs/9p] Error 2
>> make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>> make: *** [fs] Error 2
>> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
>>
>> Seems like the commit 87d7845aa0b is the corrupt which added the function v9fs_vfs_setattr_dotl()
>
> Yes, it is a problem I created. Stephen Rothwell has already fixed it.
> Al Viro has sent a git pull request to Linus today with the fix in it.
> Here is the patch you need: http://lkml.org/lkml/2010/6/21/442

I fail to apply the patch.

aapi205:/usr/src/linux# patch -p1 < ../9p-patch.txt
patching file fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1052.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file fs/9p/vfs_inode.c.rej

aapi205:/usr/src/linux# cat fs/9p/vfs_inode.c.rej
--- fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
+++ fs/9p/vfs_inode.c
@@ -1052,10 +1052,19 @@
return PTR_ERR(fid);

retval = p9_client_setattr(fid, &p9attr);
- if (retval >= 0)
- retval = inode_setattr(dentry->d_inode, iattr);
+ if (retval < 0)
+ return retval;

- return retval;
+ if ((iattr->ia_valid & ATTR_SIZE) &&
+ iattr->ia_size != i_size_read(dentry->d_inode)) {
+ retval = vmtruncate(dentry->d_inode, iattr->ia_size);
+ if (retval)
+ return retval;
+ }
+
+ setattr_copy(dentry->d_inode, iattr);
+ mark_inode_dirty(dentry->d_inode);
+ return 0;
}

/**

I must be doing something wrong way.

Regards,

Piotr Hosowicz

--
Z cyklu "Uroki demokracji", czyli pytania i odpowiedzi w teledurniejach:
- Jak� walut� maj� Indie?
- Ramadan.
NP: Patrick O'Hearn - Approaching Summit
NB: 2.6.35-git9
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/