Prev: i915_do_wait_request BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at (null)
Next: [000/197] 2.6.32.12-stable review
From: Andy Shevchenko on 22 Apr 2010 04:50 On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> wrote: > This patch series turned up two days before the 2.6.33 release, which > is fairly exactly the time when non-bugfixes won't get looked at! I > stored it all away for consideration after we've finished the > 2.6.34-rc1 merge scramble. Any news here? Should I resubmit series? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Andy Shevchenko on 2 May 2010 14:20
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 10:07 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> wrote: > I had to fiddle with it: > - use tolower(), saving 3 bytes! > - test the more common case first - it's quicker. Agreed in conjunction with comment from Joe Perches. I'll resend new patch soon. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |