From: Hiroshi Inoue on
Dave Page wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(a)tpf.co.jp> wrote:
>> Maybe I'm missing the point and have a question.
>>
>> For example, do 32bit psql and the 64bit one have the same name?
>> If so, where will they be installed?
>
> I'm only talking about libpq. I see no reason to have 32 & 64 bit
> versions of other utilities installed in parallel.

Well what about the libraries (e.g openssl) libpq links?

regards,
Hiroshi Inoue



--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

From: Dave Page on
On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(a)tpf.co.jp> wrote:
> Dave Page wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 7, 2010 at 3:58 AM, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(a)tpf.co.jp> wrote:
>>>
>>> Maybe I'm missing the point and have a question.
>>>
>>> For example, do 32bit psql and the 64bit one have the same name?
>>> If so, where will they be installed?
>>
>> I'm only talking about libpq. I see no reason to have 32 & 64 bit
>> versions of other utilities installed in parallel.
>
> Well what about the libraries (e.g openssl) libpq links?

Yes, that is an issue as I noted earlier. We probably would still have
to put the 32 bit and 64 bit libraries in a different directory
because of their naming conventions.


--
Dave Page
EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

First  |  Prev  | 
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: global\pg_auth
Next: execute sql commands in core