Prev: [PATCH 3/4] padata: Check for valid cpumasks
Next: [PATCH 2/4] padata: Allocate cpumask dependend recources in any case
From: Dave Chinner on 21 Jul 2010 01:30 On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 05:44:24PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:45:25 +1000 Dave Chinner <david(a)fromorbit.com> wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 03:36:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > > > On Tue, 20 Jul 2010 16:41:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > > Has anyone seen this or something similar? > > > > > > I get it all the time. See the thread "Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for > > > July 7". > > > > Yet nobody else seems to be able to reproduce it. Given that powerPC > > is good at triggering reace conditions, maybe there is one that > > only you are unlucky eough to trigger. > > > > Rather than just commenting out the BUG_ON() and ignoring the > > problem, can you print out the inode state (and enough information > > to identify the filesystem the inode belongs to) before triggering > > the BUG_ON() so we can get some idea of how this is triggering? > > Already did. ext3. I_DIRTY_SYNC, I_DIRTY_DATASYNC and I_DIRTY_PAGES > are set (i_state=0x67). > > A bit of poking around indicates that these inodes always have zero > attached pages, They should, because by the time that bug fires they should have had all their pages stripped away. > and they were dirtied within dquot_free_space(). AFAICT dquot_free_space() is called deep in the guts of ext3_truncate() via dquot_free_block(), which is called directly before end_writeback(). That should overwrite any state changes made inside ext3_truncate. I wonder if iput_final() is racing with something else here? > This isn't necessarily a problem in the quota code (setting aside the > question: why the heck does dquot_free_space() set I_DIRTY_PAGES??). > If the vfs is asked to kill off a dirty inode, it should at least clean > the thing first. > > I dunno. That fs/inode.c patch series from Viro looks fishy. I guess > I get to bisect it tomorrow. I suspect that is the only way to get to the bottom of this, short of a reliable reproducer being discovered. I'm still trying to reproduce it - I've even turned quota on - but I'm not having any more luck than over the weekend, though... Cheers, Dave. -- Dave Chinner david(a)fromorbit.com -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Andrew Morton on 21 Jul 2010 03:40 On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:20:07 +1000 Dave Chinner <david(a)fromorbit.com> wrote: > > and they were dirtied within dquot_free_space(). > > AFAICT dquot_free_space() is called deep in the guts of > ext3_truncate() via dquot_free_block(), which is called directly > before end_writeback(). That should overwrite any state changes made > inside ext3_truncate. I wonder if iput_final() is racing with > something else here? > This isn't a race. I type `make' and the warnings spew out at hundreds per second - every unlink, I'd say. Did you try my .config? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Stephen Rothwell on 21 Jul 2010 03:50 On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:29:07 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:20:07 +1000 Dave Chinner <david(a)fromorbit.com> wrote: > > > > and they were dirtied within dquot_free_space(). > > > > AFAICT dquot_free_space() is called deep in the guts of > > ext3_truncate() via dquot_free_block(), which is called directly > > before end_writeback(). That should overwrite any state changes made > > inside ext3_truncate. I wonder if iput_final() is racing with > > something else here? > > > > This isn't a race. I type `make' and the warnings spew out at hundreds > per second - every unlink, I'd say. Bisected to: commit 8bfe4a06746e5f03c02afe3ceb97b5364c099f63 Author: Al Viro <viro(a)zeniv.linux.org.uk> Date: Sun Jun 6 07:08:19 2010 -0400 convert ext3 to ->evict_inode() Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro(a)zeniv.linux.org.uk> -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
From: Jan Kara on 21 Jul 2010 08:20 On Wed 21-07-10 17:48:09, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 00:29:07 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm(a)linux-foundation.org> wrote: > > > > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 15:20:07 +1000 Dave Chinner <david(a)fromorbit.com> wrote: > > > > > > and they were dirtied within dquot_free_space(). > > > > > > AFAICT dquot_free_space() is called deep in the guts of > > > ext3_truncate() via dquot_free_block(), which is called directly > > > before end_writeback(). That should overwrite any state changes made > > > inside ext3_truncate. I wonder if iput_final() is racing with > > > something else here? > > > > > > > This isn't a race. I type `make' and the warnings spew out at hundreds > > per second - every unlink, I'd say. > > Bisected to: > > commit 8bfe4a06746e5f03c02afe3ceb97b5364c099f63 > Author: Al Viro <viro(a)zeniv.linux.org.uk> > Date: Sun Jun 6 07:08:19 2010 -0400 > > convert ext3 to ->evict_inode() > > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro(a)zeniv.linux.org.uk> Thanks for bisecting this. The patch series indeed seems to uncover some discrepancies. Ext3 has always dirtied inode in it's ->delete_inode method (via quota code). But previously clear_inode() just overwrote the state with I_CLEAR and thus we never saw the BUG_ON. After Al's patches, i_state is set in end_writeback() which happens earlier. In particular it happens before ext3_free_inode() which dirties the inode through quota code while freeing xattrs - they are accounted in i_blocks, so i_blocks are updated during freeing and inode is dirtied. Actually, ext3_mark_inode_dirty() called during each mark_inode_dirty() call writes the inode state to the journal so the dirty flag in the inode state is in fact stale and overwriting it with I_CLEAR never mattered. In this sense, the BUG_ON triggered is a false positive. But I believe this is a separate story. I'm not sure how to really fix this. It seems a bit premature to me to mark inode as I_CLEAR before the filesystem is actually done with it. So maybe the line inode->i_state = I_FREEING | I_CLEAR; should be moved to evict() fuction? Honza -- Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Jan Kara on 21 Jul 2010 08:30 On Tue 20-07-10 17:44:24, Andrew Morton wrote: > On Wed, 21 Jul 2010 08:45:25 +1000 .... > This isn't necessarily a problem in the quota code (setting aside the > question: why the heck does dquot_free_space() set I_DIRTY_PAGES??). Because sometime in the dark past (2.4 days I believe), I used mark_inode_dirty in quota functions (not sure whether there even were different inode dirty flags back then) and it stayed this way upto now. mark_inode_dirty_sync() is of course more appropriate for quota code these days. Cleanup is on its way... Honza -- Jan Kara <jack(a)suse.cz> SUSE Labs, CR -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
First
|
Prev
|
Next
|
Last
Pages: 1 2 3 Prev: [PATCH 3/4] padata: Check for valid cpumasks Next: [PATCH 2/4] padata: Allocate cpumask dependend recources in any case |