Prev: [PATCH v2] mISDN: Explicitly ignore unused return value of _hfcpci_softirq
Next: [PATCH 1/2] Security: Fix some coding styles in security/keys/keyring.c
From: Stephen Rothwell on 3 Mar 2010 23:50
Hi Eric,

Today's linux-next merge of the fsnotify tree got a conflict in
include/linux/fsnotify.h between commit
cccc6bba3f771ef29b33e4f79e70ebc3dba245b0 ("Lose the first argument of
audit_inode_child()") from the vfs tree and commits
a65c9effb4c7b86d032b5188ddbd0e2e583cb81b ("inotify: remove inotify in
kernel interface"), 76864b426a99a3d08aa53e554ddc748ac49ca633 ("Lose the
first argument of audit_inode_child()") and
7278f4df3bfbc7934fc590d8a5707d3a8ee3d866 ("fsnotify: use unsigned char *
for dentry->d_name.name") from the fsnotify tree.

This has come about partly because, when you rebased and linearized your
tree, you included inline the two patches from Al that he had put in a
separate branch for you to merge. You should have just remerged Al's
for-fsnotify branch at the appropriate place in your tree.

I fixed it up (again) and can carry this for a while.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [PATCH v2] mISDN: Explicitly ignore unused return value of _hfcpci_softirq
Next: [PATCH 1/2] Security: Fix some coding styles in security/keys/keyring.c