Prev: linux-next: build failure after merge of the fuse tree
Next: [PATCH V2] x86/pat: fix memory leak in free_memtype
From: Stephen Rothwell on 25 May 2010 22:00 Hi Michal, Today's linux-next merge of the kbuild tree got a conflict in Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt between commit 74bb7003010ff0998e280a6ade09381168ff20ec ("docs-kbuild-make-examples-content2") from the kernel-doc tree and commit e8d400a933fa44e2fba3849b084e1ae5814d7fca ("kbuild: fix a couple of typos in Documentation") from the kbuild tree. The former also fixed the typo, so I used that. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
From: Randy Dunlap on 26 May 2010 11:50 On 05/25/10 18:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Michal, > > Today's linux-next merge of the kbuild tree got a conflict in > Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt between commit > 74bb7003010ff0998e280a6ade09381168ff20ec > ("docs-kbuild-make-examples-content2") from the kernel-doc tree and > commit e8d400a933fa44e2fba3849b084e1ae5814d7fca ("kbuild: fix a couple of > typos in Documentation") from the kbuild tree. > > The former also fixed the typo, so I used that. If Michal has merged it, I'll drop it. Michal, can I view your tree by using gitweb? (i.e., http) or is it only accessible by pulling/cloning? thanks, -- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Stephen Rothwell on 26 May 2010 13:00 Hi Randy, On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:47:50 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap(a)oracle.com> wrote: > > On 05/25/10 18:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the kbuild tree got a conflict in > > Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt between commit > > 74bb7003010ff0998e280a6ade09381168ff20ec > > ("docs-kbuild-make-examples-content2") from the kernel-doc tree and > > commit e8d400a933fa44e2fba3849b084e1ae5814d7fca ("kbuild: fix a couple of > > typos in Documentation") from the kbuild tree. > > > > The former also fixed the typo, so I used that. > > If Michal has merged it, I'll drop it. > > Michal, can I view your tree by using gitweb? (i.e., http) > or is it only accessible by pulling/cloning? The kernel-doc tree is a quilt series :-( You can, of course, see the above commit in the linux-next tree via gitweb on kernel.org. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/
From: Randy Dunlap on 26 May 2010 13:00 On Thu, 27 May 2010 02:50:20 +1000 Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Randy, > > On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:47:50 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap(a)oracle.com> wrote: > > > > On 05/25/10 18:53, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > > > > > Today's linux-next merge of the kbuild tree got a conflict in > > > Documentation/kbuild/makefiles.txt between commit > > > 74bb7003010ff0998e280a6ade09381168ff20ec > > > ("docs-kbuild-make-examples-content2") from the kernel-doc tree and > > > commit e8d400a933fa44e2fba3849b084e1ae5814d7fca ("kbuild: fix a couple of > > > typos in Documentation") from the kbuild tree. > > > > > > The former also fixed the typo, so I used that. > > > > If Michal has merged it, I'll drop it. > > > > Michal, can I view your tree by using gitweb? (i.e., http) > > or is it only accessible by pulling/cloning? > > The kernel-doc tree is a quilt series :-( Yes. and it's viewable without pulling/cloning. ;) > You can, of course, see the above commit in the linux-next tree via > gitweb on kernel.org. Thanks. Michal, I droppped these 3 patches. Please keep them in the kbuild tree. --- ~Randy *** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code *** -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Stephen Rothwell on 26 May 2010 19:10
Hi Randy, On Wed, 26 May 2010 09:56:06 -0700 Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap(a)oracle.com> wrote: > > > The kernel-doc tree is a quilt series :-( > > Yes. and it's viewable without pulling/cloning. ;) Ah, I shouldn't reply to emails so late at night :-( > > You can, of course, see the above commit in the linux-next tree via > > gitweb on kernel.org. > > Thanks. Michal, I droppped these 3 patches. Please keep them in the > kbuild tree. If anything, the kernel-doc patches should be kept as they are much more extensive. And the conflict was trivial. The kbuild patch was just fixing a typo (tey -> they). -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell sfr(a)canb.auug.org.au http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/ |