Prev: [tip:perf/core] perf, x86: Report error code that returned from x86_pmu.hw_config()
Next: perf: x86: fix callgraphs of 32-bit processes on 64-bit kernels V3.
From: Ingo Molnar on 17 Mar 2010 06:00 * Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > You add chained indirect calls into all lock ops, that's got to hurt. > > Well, the idea was not bad at the first glance. It was separating lockdep > and lock events codes. > > But indeed, the indirect calls plus the locking are not good for such a fast > path. What would be nice to have is some sort of dynamic patching approach to enable _both_ lockdep, lockstat and perf lock. If TRACE_EVENT() tracepoints were patchable we could use them. (but they arent right now) Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/ |