From: Michael A. Terrell on 28 Apr 2010 07:48 John Larkin wrote: > > Paul E. Schoen wrote: > > > >Not big enough to filter spam. I put a couple of 30 uF 660 VAC oil filled > >capacitors on my computer screen, and I no longer saw any spam! > > Wrap your monitor in tinfoil. I've heard that works. It's more effective to wrap the spammer in Saran Wrap.
From: Paul E. Schoen on 28 Apr 2010 15:58 "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message news:hbSdnUFsudMXvUXWnZ2dnUVZ_h0AAAAA(a)earthlink.com... > > John Larkin wrote: >> >> Paul E. Schoen wrote: >> > >> >Not big enough to filter spam. I put a couple of 30 uF 660 VAC oil >> >filled >> >capacitors on my computer screen, and I no longer saw any spam! >> >> Wrap your monitor in tinfoil. I've heard that works. > > > It's more effective to wrap the spammer in Saran Wrap. Too transparent. I prefer a body bag... Paul
From: krw on 28 Apr 2010 18:04 On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:58:20 -0400, "Paul E. Schoen" <paul(a)pstech-inc.com> wrote: > >"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message >news:hbSdnUFsudMXvUXWnZ2dnUVZ_h0AAAAA(a)earthlink.com... >> >> John Larkin wrote: >>> >>> Paul E. Schoen wrote: >>> > >>> >Not big enough to filter spam. I put a couple of 30 uF 660 VAC oil >>> >filled >>> >capacitors on my computer screen, and I no longer saw any spam! >>> >>> Wrap your monitor in tinfoil. I've heard that works. >> >> >> It's more effective to wrap the spammer in Saran Wrap. > >Too transparent. I prefer a body bag... Doesn't matter, after you light the gasoline.
From: Michael A. Terrell on 28 Apr 2010 19:24 "Paul E. Schoen" wrote: > > "Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message > news:hbSdnUFsudMXvUXWnZ2dnUVZ_h0AAAAA(a)earthlink.com... > > > > John Larkin wrote: > >> > >> Paul E. Schoen wrote: > >> > > >> >Not big enough to filter spam. I put a couple of 30 uF 660 VAC oil > >> >filled > >> >capacitors on my computer screen, and I no longer saw any spam! > >> > >> Wrap your monitor in tinfoil. I've heard that works. > > > > > > It's more effective to wrap the spammer in Saran Wrap. > > Too transparent. I prefer a body bag... It's too hard to tell when they stop breathing if they're in a body bag. -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge.
From: Michael A. Terrell on 28 Apr 2010 19:26
"krw(a)att.bizzzzzzzzzzzz" wrote: > > On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:58:20 -0400, "Paul E. Schoen" <paul(a)pstech-inc.com> > wrote: > > > > >"Michael A. Terrell" <mike.terrell(a)earthlink.net> wrote in message > >news:hbSdnUFsudMXvUXWnZ2dnUVZ_h0AAAAA(a)earthlink.com... > >> > >> John Larkin wrote: > >>> > >>> Paul E. Schoen wrote: > >>> > > >>> >Not big enough to filter spam. I put a couple of 30 uF 660 VAC oil > >>> >filled > >>> >capacitors on my computer screen, and I no longer saw any spam! > >>> > >>> Wrap your monitor in tinfoil. I've heard that works. > >> > >> > >> It's more effective to wrap the spammer in Saran Wrap. > > > >Too transparent. I prefer a body bag... > > Doesn't matter, after you light the gasoline. Spammer Flamb�? -- Anyone wanting to run for any political office in the US should have to have a DD214, and a honorable discharge. |