Prev: what happened to "text file busy" ?
Next: ld: fatal: relocations remain against allocatable but non-writable sections
From: Michael Schreiber on 17 Nov 2006 08:07 hi, i have a problem with lsof under solaris 10 sparc: lsof -i |tail -2 httpd 29589 wwwrun 123u IPv4 0x300100cd600 0t0 TCP *:65535 (LISTEN) httpd 29589 wwwrun 124u IPv4 0x3000fd8c500 0t0 TCP *:65535 (LISTEN) -> WHY IS THE PORT 80 NOT LISTET? *:65535 -> should be *:80 or *:http on our solaris 9 system: lsof -i | tail -2 httpd 1994 orainst 16u IPv4 0x3000b7d4f50 0t0 TCP *:7786 (LISTEN) httpd 1994 orainst 17u IPv4 0x3000b7d4dd0 0t0 TCP *:7785 (LISTEN) httpd 1994 orainst 18u IPv4 0x3000b7d4c50 0t0 TCP *:7784 (LISTEN) any suggestions? thanks in advance mike
From: Casper H.S. Dik on 17 Nov 2006 09:19 Michael Schreiber <nospam(a)schreiber.at> writes: >hi, >i have a problem with lsof under solaris 10 sparc: >lsof -i |tail -2 >httpd 29589 wwwrun 123u IPv4 0x300100cd600 0t0 TCP *:65535 >(LISTEN) >httpd 29589 wwwrun 124u IPv4 0x3000fd8c500 0t0 TCP *:65535 >(LISTEN) >-> WHY IS THE PORT 80 NOT LISTET? *:65535 -> should be *:80 or *:http >on our solaris 9 system: >lsof -i | tail -2 >httpd 1994 orainst 16u IPv4 0x3000b7d4f50 0t0 TCP *:7786 >(LISTEN) >httpd 1994 orainst 17u IPv4 0x3000b7d4dd0 0t0 TCP *:7785 >(LISTEN) >httpd 1994 orainst 18u IPv4 0x3000b7d4c50 0t0 TCP *:7784 >(LISTEN) >any suggestions? Recompile lsof? Casper -- Expressed in this posting are my opinions. They are in no way related to opinions held by my employer, Sun Microsystems. Statements on Sun products included here are not gospel and may be fiction rather than truth.
From: AHinMaine on 17 Nov 2006 10:41 On Nov 17, 8:07 am, Michael Schreiber <nos...(a)schreiber.at> wrote: > hi, > > i have a problem with lsof under solaris 10 sparc: > > lsof -i |tail -2 > httpd 29589 wwwrun 123u IPv4 0x300100cd600 0t0 TCP *:65535 > (LISTEN) > httpd 29589 wwwrun 124u IPv4 0x3000fd8c500 0t0 TCP *:65535 > (LISTEN) > > -> WHY IS THE PORT 80 NOT LISTET? *:65535 -> should be *:80 or *:http It is a vast assumption that the last two lines of your lsof output will be httpd using port 80. Instead, try lsof -i :80 -- Andy
From: Michael Schreiber on 17 Nov 2006 10:47 # lsof -i :80 returns nothing lsof -i @x.x.x.x returns nothing because all ports are listet @ TCP 65535. i have this problem on all my solaris 10 sparc maschines. can anybody confirm that? thx "AHinMaine" <aharrison(a)gmail.com> wrote in news:1163778116.613682.113550 @b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com: > > > On Nov 17, 8:07 am, Michael Schreiber <nos...(a)schreiber.at> wrote: >> hi, >> >> i have a problem with lsof under solaris 10 sparc: >> >> lsof -i |tail -2 >> httpd 29589 wwwrun 123u IPv4 0x300100cd600 0t0 TCP *:65535 >> (LISTEN) >> httpd 29589 wwwrun 124u IPv4 0x3000fd8c500 0t0 TCP *:65535 >> (LISTEN) >> >> -> WHY IS THE PORT 80 NOT LISTET? *:65535 -> should be *:80 or *:http > > It is a vast assumption that the last two lines of your lsof output > will be httpd using port 80. Instead, try lsof -i :80 >
From: j.goerke on 17 Nov 2006 10:51
Michael Schreiber <nospam(a)schreiber.at> wrote: > because all ports are listet @ TCP 65535. > i have this problem on all my solaris 10 sparc maschines. > can anybody confirm that? Are you absolutely sure you're using a version of lsof that has been compiled for use with Solaris 10? I had similar problems using one from Solaris 8 with Solaris 9. Jens -- Jens Goerke, mobilcom Server Systeme mobilcom Communicationstechnik GmbH, Hollerstr. 126, 24782 Buedelsdorf Tel: +49-(0)4331-69-5505 Fax: +49-(0)4331-69-5599 |