From: Björn Jacke on
Hi Chris,

On 2010-03-11 at 17:49 -0500 Chris Smith sent off:
> It doesn't seem to like the fact that I have a secondary address on lo:

indeed and your problem looks like something I also encountered some time
ago. Can you please try this patch and tell if it helps?:

https://bugzilla.samba.org/attachment.cgi?id=4850&action=view

Thanks
Björn
--
SerNet GmbH, Bahnhofsallee 1b, 37081 Göttingen
phone: +49-551-370000-0, fax: +49-551-370000-9
AG Göttingen, HRB 2816, GF: Dr. Johannes Loxen

--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba
From: Chris Smith on
I've removed the secondary lo address to eliminate that as part of the problem.

However, I'm now getting virtually immediate failures in both the:
nmblookup -B BIGSERVER __SAMBA__
(this resolves for about a second) and
nmblookup -M testgroup
(never resolves) tests. With or without the "interfaces" parameters.

When it fails a log level 1 of log.nmbd shows:
========================================================
[2010/03/12 11:53:22.384326, 0] nmbd/asyncdns.c:155(start_async_dns)
started asyncdns process 9143
========================================================
as the last entry.

Whereas in my working test server there are no entries containing
"asyncdns". Google turns up some hits but I haven't found a solution
yet.

Chris
--
To unsubscribe from this list go to the following URL and read the
instructions: https://lists.samba.org/mailman/options/samba