make everything target
in [PgSql]
|
From: Peter Eisentraut on 27 Jan 2010 13:28 On ons, 2010-01-27 at 10:41 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > I'd like to have an "everything" target that would build "all + html + > contrib". +10 > And maybe an "installcheck-everything" target that would run > installcheck for src, pl and contrib. +100 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: David Fetter on 27 Jan 2010 17:10 On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 10:41:16AM -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > I'd like to have an "everything" target that would build "all + html > + contrib". > > And maybe an "installcheck-everything" target that would run > installcheck for src, pl and contrib. > > Thoughts? +1 on both :) Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <david(a)fetter.org> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: david.fetter(a)gmail.com iCal: webcal://www.tripit.com/feed/ical/people/david74/tripit.ics Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Tom Lane on 27 Jan 2010 17:38 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(a)gmx.net> writes: > On ons, 2010-01-27 at 10:41 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> I'd like to have an "everything" target that would build "all + html + >> contrib". > +10 >> And maybe an "installcheck-everything" target that would run >> installcheck for src, pl and contrib. > +100 These proposals sound reasonable to me too, but is "everything" an appropriate target name, or is there some other/better convention? I assume we don't want to mess with the default behavior (I don't want to, anyway). regards, tom lane -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: "David E. Wheeler" on 27 Jan 2010 17:51 On Jan 27, 2010, at 2:38 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > These proposals sound reasonable to me too, but is "everything" an > appropriate target name, or is there some other/better convention? Oooh, more bike-shedding. make theworld make toutlemonde make myday make lovenotwar Best, David -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
From: Andrew Dunstan on 27 Jan 2010 18:02
Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(a)gmx.net> writes: > >> On ons, 2010-01-27 at 10:41 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: >> >>> I'd like to have an "everything" target that would build "all + html + >>> contrib". >>> > > >> +10 >> > > >>> And maybe an "installcheck-everything" target that would run >>> installcheck for src, pl and contrib. >>> > > >> +100 >> > > These proposals sound reasonable to me too, but is "everything" an > appropriate target name, or is there some other/better convention? > I'm not invested in the name. Suggestions welcome. > I assume we don't want to mess with the default behavior (I don't > want to, anyway). > > Me either, although it's a bit of a pity history has stuck us with the default behaviour. cheers andrew -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers |