Prev: Notion of Absolute Clock Synchronization in SR
Next: What the hell, Jerome Drexler?
From: rotchm on 12 Mar 2010 11:17
On Mar 12, 11:06 am, Tom Roberts <tjrob...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> BURT wrote:
> > If light has kinetic energy then it is quantified by the constant C.
> > Every light wave would have the same energy.
>
> Why do you repeatedly make such idiotic statements, that are in wild
> disagreement with simple and basic observations? All they do is illustrate your
> complete and utter lack of understanding of even very basic physics.
>
> Why bother? What's the point?
>
> Tom Roberts

If you answer bert you stay at the same place very fast with speed C.


Not mitch raemsch
From: Igor on 12 Mar 2010 12:40
On Mar 11, 7:23 pm, "I. F." <exformat...(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> hello,
>
> are you really sure that the mass of the photon is zero and that its
> speed is c, since photons have a variable energy and frequency, and
> that the frequency of the electron depends on its speed?
>
> its mass might be extremely low and its speed extremely close to c

Exactly. Look up Proca's equations.

From: BURT on 12 Mar 2010 19:45
On Mar 12, 8:06 am, Tom Roberts <tjrob...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> BURT wrote:
> > If light has kinetic energy then it is quantified by the constant C.
> > Every light wave would have the same energy.
>
> Why do you repeatedly make such idiotic statements, that are in wild
> disagreement with simple and basic observations? All they do is illustrate your
> complete and utter lack of understanding of even very basic physics.
>
> Why bother? What's the point?
>
> Tom Roberts

I bother because it is a fact. If light has a constant speed its
kinetic energy would also be a constant.

Mitch Raemsch
From: FrediFizzx on 12 Mar 2010 21:40
"I. F." <exformatist(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:23bf9f3c-f09d-4277-927b-456e07e1180a(a)t20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
> hello,
>
> are you really sure that the mass of the photon is zero and that its
> speed is c, since photons have a variable energy and frequency, and
> that the frequency of the electron depends on its speed?

The frequency only really depends on wavelength; not speed.

> its mass might be extremely low and its speed extremely close to c

First... tell me what you think "mass" is as far as it could relate to
a photon.

From: FrediFizzx on 12 Mar 2010 22:03
"rotchm" <rotchm(a)gmail.com> wrote in message
news:37423dc6-f1b2-4e9b-b3c2-94c42c68aa24(a)t20g2000yqe.googlegroups.com...
> On Mar 12, 11:06 am, Tom Roberts <tjrob...(a)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>> BURT wrote:
>> > If light has kinetic energy then it is quantified by the constant
>> > C.
>> > Every light wave would have the same energy.
>>
>> Why do you repeatedly make such idiotic statements, that are in wild
>> disagreement with simple and basic observations? All they do is
>> illustrate your
>> complete and utter lack of understanding of even very basic physics.
>>
>> Why bother? What's the point?
>>
>> Tom Roberts
>
> If you answer bert you stay at the same place very fast with speed C.

LOL! Is that "bert" or "burt"? Time to reset my killfile I thinks.

First  |  Prev  |  Next  |  Last
Pages: 1 2 3
Prev: Notion of Absolute Clock Synchronization in SR
Next: What the hell, Jerome Drexler?