From: Kevin on 23 Mar 2010 03:13 It seems that the training symbols have to use the same modulation as the data symbols. Is there any way that I can use different modulations? say QPSK for training and 16QAM for data. I tried equalizing the two parts separately with a constellation change in between. The shape of the equalized constellation seems correct, but it is compressed. Of course the demodulation result is wrong. Thanks
From: Kevin on 23 Mar 2010 03:27 In other words, what should I do if the average power of the training and data are different? On Mar 23, 3:13 pm, Kevin <umass.amhe...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > It seems that the training symbols have to use the same modulation as > the data symbols. Is there any way that I can use different > modulations? say QPSK for training and 16QAM for data. I tried > equalizing the two parts separately with a constellation change in > between. The shape of the equalized constellation seems correct, but > it is compressed. Of course the demodulation result is wrong. > Thanks
|
Pages: 1 Prev: estimation parameter using fminsearch Next: Error, (in int) integer too large in context |