Prev: METEX M-4650
Next: BE HAPPY- WATCH VIDEOS
From: Andrew VK3BFA on 27 Apr 2010 10:04 On Mar 17, 11:57 am, "Dave M" <dgminala4...(a)mediacombb.net> wrote: > Jeff Liebermann wrote: > > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:32:28 -0800 (PST), klem kedidelhopper > > <captainvideo462...(a)gmail.com> wrote: > > >> After setting zero I moved my finger over the meter face first thing > >> in the morning and the needle moved up scale about 10 percent. I let > >> it sit on the bench for about 24 hours without touching it. When I > >> looked at it again it was back to zero. So the trick is to set it, > >> leave it for a day let it discharge, and then tweak it again. Clumsy > >> procedure but it works. Glad this is my own equipment and not a > >> customer repair job....Lenny > > > Nice workaround. So it is static. Is this NORMAL for a small panel > > meter? We don't have much of a static problem on the left coast, so I > > don't see much of that. I waved my hand around various small panel > > meters around the shop. No deflection. > > The easiest and best solution is to eliminate the static charge by rubbing > the meter face with a clothes dryer anti-cling sheet. Alternatively, buy a > bottle of anti-cling spray and give the meter a ligh misting. > That will dissipate the static charge and you can handle the meter as you > wish without upsetting the zero setting. > > -- > David > dgminala at mediacombb dot net This all sounds terribly bizarre - Its a moving coil meter, it might go "whack" on getting a static charge, but a steady reading? - must be an INCREDIBLY sensitive meter movement- femtoamps? - have a look at the output of the op amp, preferably with an analogue meter - (as suggested) (no signal, 0 output) and the bias resistors around it. Especially the high value (>100k ones) (any Tantalum capacitors, replace them) (sorry Dave - a view from the trenches) Andrew VK3BFA. PS - its axiomatic that the thing causing the fault is in the least accessible section of the cct. A variation of Murphys Law.
From: greenpjs on 27 Apr 2010 15:52 On Tue, 27 Apr 2010 07:04:53 -0700 (PDT), Andrew VK3BFA <VK3BFA(a)wia.org.au> wrote: >On Mar 17, 11:57�am, "Dave M" <dgminala4...(a)mediacombb.net> wrote: >> Jeff Liebermann wrote: >> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:32:28 -0800 (PST), klem kedidelhopper >> > <captainvideo462...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> After setting zero I moved my finger over the meter face first thing >> >> in the morning and the needle moved up scale about 10 percent. I let >> >> it sit on the bench for about 24 hours without touching it. When I >> >> looked at it again it was back to zero. So the trick is to set it, >> >> leave it for a day let it discharge, and then tweak it again. Clumsy >> >> procedure but it works. Glad this is my own equipment and not a >> >> customer repair job....Lenny >> >> > Nice workaround. �So it is static. �Is this NORMAL for a small panel >> > meter? �We don't have much of a static problem on the left coast, so I >> > don't see much of that. �I waved my hand around various small panel >> > meters around the shop. �No deflection. >> >> The easiest and best solution is to eliminate the static charge by rubbing >> the meter face with a clothes dryer anti-cling sheet. Alternatively, buy a >> bottle of anti-cling spray and give the meter a ligh misting. >> That will dissipate the static charge and you can handle the meter as you >> wish without upsetting the zero setting. >> >> -- >> David >> dgminala at mediacombb dot net > >This all sounds terribly bizarre - Its a moving coil meter, it might >go "whack" on getting a static charge, but a steady reading? It is NOT current flow from a static discharge that creates the reading. It is a static (as in unchanging) charge on the case attracting or repelling some other part of the movement. - must be >an INCREDIBLY sensitive meter movement- femtoamps? - have a look at >the output of the op amp, preferably with an analogue meter - (as >suggested) (no signal, 0 output) and the bias resistors around it. >Especially the high value (>100k ones) (any Tantalum capacitors, >replace them) >(sorry Dave - a view from the trenches) > >Andrew VK3BFA. > >PS - its axiomatic that the thing causing the fault is in the least >accessible section of the cct. A variation of Murphys Law.
From: Paul Hovnanian P.E. on 28 Apr 2010 13:32 Andrew VK3BFA wrote: > On Mar 17, 11:57 am, "Dave M" <dgminala4...(a)mediacombb.net> wrote: >> Jeff Liebermann wrote: >> > On Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:32:28 -0800 (PST), klem kedidelhopper >> > <captainvideo462...(a)gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> After setting zero I moved my finger over the meter face first thing >> >> in the morning and the needle moved up scale about 10 percent. I let >> >> it sit on the bench for about 24 hours without touching it. When I >> >> looked at it again it was back to zero. So the trick is to set it, >> >> leave it for a day let it discharge, and then tweak it again. Clumsy >> >> procedure but it works. Glad this is my own equipment and not a >> >> customer repair job....Lenny >> >> > Nice workaround. So it is static. Is this NORMAL for a small panel >> > meter? We don't have much of a static problem on the left coast, so I >> > don't see much of that. I waved my hand around various small panel >> > meters around the shop. No deflection. >> >> The easiest and best solution is to eliminate the static charge by >> rubbing the meter face with a clothes dryer anti-cling sheet. >> Alternatively, buy a bottle of anti-cling spray and give the meter a ligh >> misting. That will dissipate the static charge and you can handle the >> meter as you wish without upsetting the zero setting. >> >> -- >> David >> dgminala at mediacombb dot net > > This all sounds terribly bizarre - Its a moving coil meter, it might > go "whack" on getting a static charge, but a steady reading? - must be > an INCREDIBLY sensitive meter movement- femtoamps? - have a look at > the output of the op amp, preferably with an analogue meter - (as > suggested) (no signal, 0 output) and the bias resistors around it. > Especially the high value (>100k ones) (any Tantalum capacitors, > replace them) > (sorry Dave - a view from the trenches) > > Andrew VK3BFA. > > PS - its axiomatic that the thing causing the fault is in the least > accessible section of the cct. A variation of Murphys Law. I think the static charge thing refers to a force produced directly by a static charge on the plastic meter face acting against the needle, not a current flowing through the coil. -- Paul Hovnanian paul(a)hovnanian.com ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Have gnu, will travel.
|
Pages: 1 Prev: METEX M-4650 Next: BE HAPPY- WATCH VIDEOS |