Prev: [PATCH -V16 07/12] vfs: Support null pathname in linkat
Next: [PATCH -V16 09/12] x86: Add new syscalls for x86_64
From: FUJITA Tomonori on 12 Jul 2010 02:40
On Mon, 12 Jul 2010 15:37:20 +0900
FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori(a)lab.ntt.co.jp> wrote:

> HAVE_ARCH_PCI_SET_DMA_MASK was removed in 2.6.36 (no architecture has

Oops, HAVE_ARCH_PCI_SET_DMA_MASK was removed in 2.6.34.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
From: Michal Simek on 12 Jul 2010 09:20
FUJITA Tomonori wrote:
> HAVE_ARCH_PCI_SET_DMA_MASK was removed in 2.6.36 (no architecture has
> the own implementation of pci_set_dma_mask).

Added to next branch. I also fixed that kernel version.

Thanks,
Michal

>
> Signed-off-by: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori(a)lab.ntt.co.jp>
> ---
> arch/microblaze/include/asm/dma-mapping.h | 6 ------
> 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/dma-mapping.h b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> index 18b3731..5073895 100644
> --- a/arch/microblaze/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> +++ b/arch/microblaze/include/asm/dma-mapping.h
> @@ -79,12 +79,6 @@ static inline int dma_supported(struct device *dev, u64 mask)
> return ops->dma_supported(dev, mask);
> }
>
> -#ifdef CONFIG_PCI
> -/* We have our own implementation of pci_set_dma_mask() */
> -#define HAVE_ARCH_PCI_SET_DMA_MASK
> -
> -#endif
> -
> static inline int dma_set_mask(struct device *dev, u64 dma_mask)
> {
> struct dma_map_ops *ops = get_dma_ops(dev);


--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng)
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel 2.6 Microblaze Linux - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo(a)vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [PATCH -V16 07/12] vfs: Support null pathname in linkat
Next: [PATCH -V16 09/12] x86: Add new syscalls for x86_64