Prev: [HACKERS] Parallel pg_restore versus old dump files
Next: pg_upgrade issues
From: Alvaro Herrera on 22 Jun 2010 13:21
Excerpts from Robert Haas's message of lun jun 21 22:18:46 -0400 2010:
> In pmdie(), we have the following code, which doesn't seem to make
> much sense. If the state is PM_RECOVERY at the top of this section it
> will get changed to PM_WAIT_BACKENDS and then to PM_WAIT_BACKENDS
> again. Either the two "if" statements should be merged (and both bits
> should be handled with the same block of code) or the second one
> should say "else if". Or at least, I think so...

I'd just move the first block below the second one.

--
Álvaro Herrera <alvherre(a)commandprompt.com>
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support

--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers(a)postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

 | 
Pages: 1
Prev: [HACKERS] Parallel pg_restore versus old dump files
Next: pg_upgrade issues